Determine volume of HCl added to propionic acid to get pH=1

  • Thread starter Thread starter BThomas1219
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid Hcl Volume
AI Thread Summary
To determine the volume of 1.0M HCl needed to lower the pH of 250ml of 0.1M propionic acid (Ka=1.35E-5) to 1.00, the dissociation of propionic acid was analyzed using an ICE chart, revealing a concentration of H+ at 1.16E-3 and an initial pH of 2.93. The calculation shows that at pH 1.0, approximately 2x10^-4 of the propionic acid is dissociated, indicating that the presence of acetic acid is negligible for this pH adjustment. For the second part of the problem, raising the pH to 4.00 with 1.00M NaC3H5O2 can be approached using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, treating it as a buffer solution. The discussions emphasize the importance of understanding acid dissociation and buffer calculations in pH adjustments.
BThomas1219
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given 250ml of 0.1M HC3H5O2 (Ka=1.35E-5) What volume of
a)1.0M HCl is needed to lower the pH to 1.00.
b) 1.00M NaC3H5O2 raise pH to 4.00


Homework Equations


pH=pKa-log (HA/A)
ICE chart

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the ice chart for the dissociation of propionic acid. I determined the concentration of H+ and A- to be 1.16E-3. the pH was 2.93. I do not know how to factor in the HCl to determine the volume needed to lower the pH.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
K_a = \frac {[A^-][H^+]}{[HA]}

rearranged:

\frac {[A^-]}{[HA]} = 10^{pH - pK_a}

At pH 1.0 only about 101-4.75=10-3.75=2x10-4 of the acetic acid is dissociated. That means in the first case you can - more or less safely - assume presence of acetic acid doesn't matter much, as the first approximation pH will depend mostly on the HCl dilution.

Second case is just a buffer solution, use Henderson-Hasselbalch equation.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top