Correct definition of Relative atomic mass

AI Thread Summary
Relative atomic mass is defined as the average mass of an element's atoms compared to 1/12th of a carbon-12 atom. While carbon-12 is currently the standard reference, the definition allows for comparisons to other atoms, making it more flexible than just being relative to carbon. The concept emphasizes that the relative atomic mass is a dimensionless quantity, reflecting the mass ratio rather than an absolute mass. To achieve full marks, a complete explanation should include the historical context and the arbitrary nature of the reference atom. Understanding these nuances is essential for a comprehensive answer.
synkk
Messages
216
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Explain what you understand by the term Relative Atomic Mass

The question is equal to three marks, though i don't think I've put enough for all the marks:

The Attempt at a Solution



The mass of an atom relative to one atom of carbon-12.

I would think that's only equal to one mark, how do i get the other three?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
synkk said:

Homework Statement


Explain what you understand by the term Relative Atomic Mass

The question is equal to three marks, though i don't think I've put enough for all the marks:

The Attempt at a Solution



The mass of an atom relative to one atom of carbon-12.

I would think that's only equal to one mark, how do i get the other three?
So carbon-12 has a relative atomic mass of 1 (unity) then (viz, relative to itself)?! I'd not give you the one mark! :/
 
So how could i get receive the three marks?
 
I put: Average mass of an element compared to 1/12th of a carbon-12 atom? Hows that
 
Not bad, but not completely correct either. Relative atomic mass can be relative to any atom, doesn't have to be C-12 - the choice is arbitrary. It was oxygen in the past, it is C-12 now.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top