Can Quantum Entanglement Enable Time Loops and Superluminal Communication?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stglyde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loop Time
stglyde
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
They say that if quantum entanglement were meditated by actually superluminal exchange, causality is not violated because you can't use it to send information. This is because quantum randomness can't be control. But note there is still actual exchange of randomness information between past and future... that is.. messages from the future could actually alter the past in quantum entangelement that uses superluminal exchange scenerio). Now I just want to have an idea if there were other actual experiments where random information can go from future to past (time loop). Is there no way to test it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stglyde said:
They say that if quantum entanglement were meditated by actually superluminal exchange, causality is not violated because you can't use it to send information. This is because quantum randomness can't be control. But note there is still actual exchange of randomness information between past and future... that is.. messages from the future could actually alter the past in quantum entangelement that uses superluminal exchange scenerio). Now I just want to have an idea if there were other actual experiments where random information can go from future to past (time loop). Is there no way to test it?

If you can figure out how to test it then you might get a phone call from Stockholm.
 
PatrickPowers said:
If you can figure out how to test it then you might get a phone call from Stockholm.

Isn't it that in quantum entanglement like Aspect experiment.. there are frames in which either end would trigger the event back in time? This is because if someone occurs instantaneously in separate spacetime points.. there would always be frame in which one end receives it back in time.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top