Conformal Gravity: Understanding Attractive & Repulsive Forces

  • Thread starter ohwilleke
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gravity
In summary, Philip Mannheim's conformal gravity theory proposes a modified version of the Einstein-Hilbert action that can potentially explain the observed behavior of gravity at galactic and cosmological scales. It challenges traditional ideas such as the big bang and the cosmological constant problem, and also suggests that the gravitational constant may be incorrect. While it may not have much independent support, it presents interesting concepts and could potentially contribute to our understanding of the universe.
  • #1
ohwilleke
Gold Member
2,378
1,365
The paper "Attractive and Repulsive Gravity", http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0001/0001011.pdf by Philip Mannheim (2000) sets out at some length his theory of conformal gravity.

He starts by breaking the evidence in support of GR into those that flow from its geometric nature, which he seeks to preserve, and those which flow from the form of the Einstein-Hilbert action. He notes that his amendment of the EH action can make possible a MOND like gravity at galactic scales, eliminates the big bang and black hole singularities by making gravity repulsive in the presence of very dense energy sources and in the cosmological limit, and resolves a number of issues associated with the cosmological constant problem. It also states that at galactic and cosmological scales that there is a Machian component to gravity (i.e. the force of gravity is in part a function of the aggregate mass of the universe). Since it flows closely from the GR equations it is theoretically "well behaved".

It proposes rather than a big bang, a big time zero bounce from a minimum finite radius in which the universe has a maximal temperature (possiblity eliminating the issue of inflation), because beneath that radius the repulsive aspect of gravity overcomes other forces. It suggests that under this theory, the low ratio of matter to a running cosmological constant in the Omega sum is inevitable regardless of initial condition, rather than a coincidence.

Of particular interest to those looking to derive a quantum gravity, he accepts a figure for vacuum energy from cosmology, and uses that conclusion to determine that the gravitational constant must be deeply wrong.

While this theory has little independent support (i.e. it does not differ from GR where it reduces to GR, does not differ greatly from MOND where it reduces to MOND, does not differ from Newtonian gravity where it reduces to Newtonian gravity, and fits cosmological data by design rather than prediction) it should stand as a significant alternative to either cosmological constant cold dark matter models (the prevailing paradigm), or Relativistic MOND models (the main alternative at the galactic scale), or alternative cosmologies such as those of Arp (Quasi-Steady State).

The conclusions reached are not dramatically different from those of LQG, and indeed resemble LQG also in that LQG theorists sometimes see gravity as a counterpoint to QCD which like Mannheim's conformal gravity changes from repulsive to attractive at different distance scales.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
it is always exciting to see new theories and ideas being proposed in the field of physics. Mannheim's conformal gravity theory certainly presents some interesting concepts and potential solutions to existing problems in our current understanding of gravity.

One aspect that stands out to me is the proposal of a "big time zero bounce" instead of a big bang. This idea challenges our traditional understanding of the beginning of the universe and could potentially provide a new explanation for the observed expansion of the universe.

I am also intrigued by the suggestion that the gravitational constant may be deeply wrong. This could have significant implications for our understanding of gravity and its role in the universe.

However, as the forum post mentions, this theory does not have much independent support and may not differ greatly from existing theories in certain scenarios. As with any new theory, it will require further testing and validation through experiments and observations to truly evaluate its validity.

Overall, I believe that Mannheim's conformal gravity theory is a valuable addition to the ongoing discussions and research in the field of physics. It presents new ideas and potential solutions that could lead to a better understanding of gravity and the universe as a whole. I look forward to seeing how this theory develops and how it may contribute to our overall understanding of the cosmos.
 
  • #3



Overall, Mannheim's conformal gravity presents an interesting and thought-provoking alternative to the current theories of gravity. By preserving the geometric nature of general relativity while also addressing issues such as the cosmological constant problem and the big bang singularity, this theory offers a unique perspective on the nature of gravity and its effects on the universe.

One particularly intriguing aspect of this theory is the idea of a big time zero bounce, which suggests a different origin for the universe than the commonly accepted big bang theory. This could potentially lead to a better understanding of the early universe and its evolution.

However, as noted, this theory currently lacks independent support and its predictions are not significantly different from other existing theories in certain regimes. Therefore, more research and evidence is needed to fully evaluate the validity and potential of conformal gravity. But as a significant alternative to current theories, it is certainly worth further exploration and consideration.
 

Related to Conformal Gravity: Understanding Attractive & Repulsive Forces

1. What is conformal gravity?

Conformal gravity is a theory that explains the nature of attractive and repulsive forces between objects. It suggests that these forces are caused by the curvature of space and time, rather than being the result of direct interactions between objects.

2. How does conformal gravity differ from Newton's theory of gravity?

While Newton's theory of gravity describes the force of attraction between masses as being directly proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them, conformal gravity proposes that this force is the result of the curvature of space and time caused by the masses.

3. What evidence supports conformal gravity?

There is currently limited experimental evidence for conformal gravity, as it is still a developing theory. However, some observations of galaxy rotation curves and the expansion of the universe have been used to support the idea of gravitational forces being influenced by the curvature of space and time.

4. How does conformal gravity explain repulsive forces?

Conformal gravity suggests that repulsive forces are caused by negative curvature, or "curvature away from" an object. This negative curvature can be thought of as pushing objects away from each other, creating a repulsive force.

5. What are the implications of conformal gravity?

If confirmed, conformal gravity would have major implications for our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It could potentially lead to a more unified theory of gravity and other fundamental forces, and could also impact our understanding of dark matter and dark energy. However, more research and evidence is needed to fully understand the implications of this theory.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
590
Replies
2
Views
455
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
Replies
72
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
31
Views
582
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top