Register to reply

Is universal time the 4th or 5th Dimension?

by Terry Giblin
Tags: dimension, time, universal
Share this thread:
Terry Giblin
#1
Dec17-04, 10:31 AM
P: 170
Do we live in a 4 or 5 Dimensional Universe?

If Einstein had been told before writing SG and GR, that we live in a 5 Dimensional Universe, in which we can only see or detect the properties of the 4th Dimension, at speeds approaching the light speed.

Would he have given another name to the 4th Dimension, to what we now call Time?

In the quantum world is a clock not just another ruler?

In a quantum world if you try to measure something you affect the result you are trying to measure, including time. - but the same can be said inside every black hole, where there is a singularity, the 4th Dimension is zero, but the Gallaxies still move on.

Any answer to one or all above questions would be appreciated.

Regards

Terry Giblin
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
What lit up the universe?
Sheepdogs use just two simple rules to round up large herds of sheep
Animals first flex their muscles
pervect
#2
Dec17-04, 01:23 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
P: 7,628
It should be pretty clear, I think, that the universe has only 4 directly measurable dimensions - 3 space and one time.

Kaluza-Klein theory points out that if you consider that there is an unobservable fifth dimension, one can explain electromagnetism in geometric terms. The hypothetical fifth dimension is not directly observable, however . One often considerers the hypothetical, unobservable fifth dimension in KK theory to be "rolled up". This idea has found further expression in string theory, where the universe is considered to have 10 (or maybe it was 11) dimensions, with most of them "rolled up", and not directly observable.

But for directly observable dimensions, we have only four. I'm not sure what you are thking of as the "fifth dimension", though I suspect you are taking embedding diagrams too seriously. Why you think high velocities has anything to do with dimensional structure is also a bit of a mystery.
Terry Giblin
#3
Dec18-04, 12:41 PM
P: 170
Dear Pervect,

Thank you for your comments, I agree with the comments you made but have tried to consider an alternative interpretation.

If I could form a singularity in my hand, according to currently accept theory, relative to the singularity, time would come to a stop, which means it would have a time measurement of zero.

If fact all 4 dimensions of a singularity are zero, if they are zero - which dimension are they existing in, for us to observe occurring - if not the 5th Dimension?

If a singularity formed in a cloud, up in the sky, ignoring gravitational affects, or assume it was a super cloud, or as in the case of every blackhole which forms at the center of every galaxy, can someone please describe is motion?

I would like to go back to first principles which is why I would like a copy of the Kalusa Papers, which he sent to Einstien.

Regards

Terry Giblin

pervect
#4
Dec18-04, 07:24 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
P: 7,628
Is universal time the 4th or 5th Dimension?

Quote Quote by Terry Giblin
Dear Pervect,

Thank you for your comments, I agree with the comments you made but have tried to consider an alternative interpretation.

If I could form a singularity in my hand, according to currently accept theory, relative to the singularity, time would come to a stop, which means it would have a time measurement of zero.
I'm not sure whether you are talking about the singularity itself, or the event horizon.

The singularity itself is a point, so it has no dimension.

Space-time in the neighborhood of the singularity is still 4 dimensional. The singularity itself is a "removed point" from the 4-d space-time, one that has no dimension

Now let's talk about the event horizon. Time can be said to stop at the event horizon, but that does not mean that space-time is not 4-dimensional there. Here is an anology. If you stood at the north pole of the Earth, all directions would be south. So you would say "East and west stop at the north pole".

But the Earth is round, and the north pole is not physically different from the rest of the Earth. You can see, I hope, that the surface of the Earth is two dimensional everywhere, even at the north pole.

So it is with time at the event horizon. The problem turns out to be an issue of the coordinates used - lattitude and longitude are not well behaved at the north pole, and the Schwarzsachild coordiantes are not well behaved at the event horizon. But the structure of space-time itself is whole at the event horizon, nothing is different there. Only at the center of the black hole itself, at the singularity, is there any difference, and even there the singularity is just a missing point.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Time's arrow, or what universal property is asymmetric, anyway? General Discussion 40
Report on dimension on the governing equation.. help Mechanical Engineering 1
Edward Witten on LQG for lambda > 0, QG does not exist in any dimension Beyond the Standard Model 5
Chemical resonance is legitimate and universal Chemistry 0
Universal laptop power supply? Electrical Engineering 6