US News Rankings: How Much Do They Matter for Graduate Programs?

AI Thread Summary
When selecting a graduate program, the importance of US News rankings varies significantly by field. For mathematics, particularly in specialized subareas, rankings may not hold much weight compared to factors like faculty quality and research alignment. While general rankings can help categorize schools, they are less critical for specific disciplines, especially in physics, where the reputation of the adviser is often more influential than the institution's overall ranking. Prospective students are encouraged to evaluate the faculty's research output and the department's focus to determine the best fit for their interests. Ultimately, the decision should center on personal academic goals and the compatibility of the program with those objectives, rather than solely on rankings.
PhDorBust
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
When choosing a graduate program, how much weight should be given to its US News ranking?

I've been accepted to two schools which fall within the top 10 for general math, but for my particular subarea in math, one of them ranks about 15 spots ahead of the other. Do people actually care about these rankings? Is there any better indicator of goodness? Phds.org gives some data points but their accuracy is not too great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much weight? As much as you choose - how important is it to you to say "I graduated from a school that is Nth on the USNews Rankings"?
 
PhDorBust said:
When choosing a graduate program, how much weight should be given to its US News ranking?

In physics schools in the United States. None at all.

I've been accepted to two schools which fall within the top 10 for general math, but for my particular subarea in math, one of them ranks about 15 spots ahead of the other. Do people actually care about these rankings?

For MBA's people care a lot. For physics schools in Mainland China, people also care a lot about rankings. For physics Ph.D.'s in the US, no one cares about general school rankings. In fact, people care a lot less about your school than your adviser.

Is there any better indicator of goodness? Phds.org gives some data points but their accuracy is not too great.

Go to the web site, look at the list of professors, track down the papers that they wrote, and you should be able to make your own judgments about goodness. Also for the smaller departments, you will influence the quality of the department more than the department influences you.
 
When it comes to general rankings, these rankings should be used primarily for grouping schools into groups. That is a school in the top 10 is obviously different than a school in the 20-30 range, but withing these subgroups the differences may not matter as much. The best advice I can give is to ask people in your department (and subfield) about the quality of the schools and look up the professors who work there. If the papers being published and the research being done looks like its your kind of thing, then go for that school. Remember, you are going to a Ph.D program to study a topic of your choosing for 5-7 years with an adviser who's work should hopefully line up with your interests as closely as possible.

Now in terms of subareas, I personally don't trust the rankings as much. I don't know, I don't feel the method used by US news world and report is the best one for figuring at what school has the best topology or PDEs group because those things can get very subjective. Congrats on being accepted to such great schools, but now comes the harder part about deciding for yourself which one is better for you.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Back
Top