Simple Harmonic(Quantum) Oscillator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hyperreality
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the normalization constant A for the wave function of a simple harmonic oscillator, given by ψ(x) = Ae^{-ax^2}. The normalization condition requires that the integral of the probability density over the entire space equals one, leading to the equation A^2∫_{-∞}^{∞} e^{-2ax^2} dx = 1. The original poster mistakenly limited the integration to the amplitude range of -A to +A, which is incorrect as normalization should cover the entire range from -∞ to +∞. The correct approach involves recognizing that the integral can be solved easily using known results for Gaussian integrals, leading to the conclusion that A has the value (\frac{m\omega_0}{\hbar\pi})^{1/4}. The discussion highlights the importance of proper limits in normalization for quantum mechanics.
Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Using the normalization condition, show that the constant A has the value (\frac{m\omega_0}{\hbar\pi})^{1/4}.

I know from text the textbook that

\psi(x)=Ae^{-ax^2}

where A is the amplitdue and a=\frac{\sqrt{km}}{2\hbar}

Here is my working:

Because the motion of the particle is confined to -A to +A, so the probability of finding the particle in the interval of -A to +A must be 1. Therefore the normalization condition is

\int_{-A}^{A}|\psi(x)^2| dx = 1
A^2\int_{-A}^{A} e^{-2ax^2} dx = 1

Here's where I'm stuck, this equation cannot be solved via integration techniques, it can only be solved using by numerical methods. I only know the "trapezium rule" and the "Simpson's Rule", I tried both of methods but nothing came up. Does this problem require some other numerical methods or is my normalization condition incorrect?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Normalization is over the entire region, i.e. -\infty to +\infty, the integral is then solved very easily.

A^2\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-2ax^2} dx = 1 for a = 1 do a change of variables to get the correct answer, hence the normalization factor.
 
Have you stated the problem correctly? It appears your limits of integration are the same as the amplitude which doesn't make sense because they have different units.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top