What is a "scalar (under rotation) 1-chain"?

by ianhoolihan
Tags: None
ianhoolihan is offline
Mar6-12, 06:09 PM
P: 145
Hi all,

I am trying to make sense of a paper involving differenital geometry and Lie algebras. Here's the part I am confused about:

...Lie product map [itex]\mu: V\times V \rightarrow V[/itex] that satisfies the Jacobi identity,
This is usually written as a cyclic sum, a form that, in the case at hand, obscures its content. To clarify the latter, take as an example the case where [\itex]x[/itex] is a Lorentz group generator, [itex]J_{\mu\nu}[/itex], and [itex]y,z[/itex] are other generators carrying Lorentz indices, say [itex]Y_\rho, Z_\sigma[/itex] respectively. Suppose [itex]\mu(y,z)=\mu(Y_\rho,Z_\sigma)=W[/itex]. Substituting this into the l.h.s above, one finds that the Jacobi identity requires that the transformation properties of [itex]W[/itex] under the Lorentz group are derived solely from those of [itex]Y_\rho,Z_\sigma[/itex], i.e. in this case [itex]W[/itex] ought to transform as a second-rank covariant tensor. Another way of saying this is that [itex]\mu[/itex] itself is a Lorentz scalar, an observation that we use later on.
Now things begin with finding the cohomology of a Lie algebra. The galilean algebra is taken as an example, and the Lie product is given in terms of differential forms:

[tex]\mu=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ab}^c\Pi^a\Pi^b\otimes J_c +\epsilon_{ab}^c\Pi^a\Pi^{\bar{b}}\otimes K_c[/tex]

where barred indices refer to boosts. The paper then goes on to say:

By an argument based on the observation made [above]...we conclude that only scalar (under rotations) cochains need to be considered.
I do not see how this applies. I assume it somehow helps to simplify "the most general scalar 1-cochain":

...the most general scalar 1-cochain is given by
[tex]\phi = \alpha_1 \phi_{JJ} +\alpha_2 \phi_{KJ} +\alpha_3 \phi_{JK} +\alpha_4 \phi_{KK}[/tex]
with [itex]\phi_{JJ}=\Pi^a\otimes J_a[/itex] etc.
Now if someone could clarify this all to me, that'd be great. More specifically:

1. does [itex]\phi_{JJ}=\Pi^a\otimes J_a[/itex] mean [itex]\phi_{JJ}=\Pi^a\otimes J_a=\Pi^1 J_1 + \Pi^1 J_2+ ... +\Pi^3 J_3[/itex] i.e. with nine terms (remember the unbarred indices are rotation only, so three generators)?

2. Are the [itex]\alpha_i[/itex] real coefficients, or arrays? I.e. I would have thought
[tex]\phi=\phi^A_B\Pi^B \otimes T_A = ... = \phi ^a_b\Pi^b\otimes T_a+\phi ^a_{\bar{b}}\Pi^{\bar{b}}\otimes T_a+\phi ^{\bar{a}}_b\Pi^b\otimes T_{\bar{a}}+\phi ^{\bar{a}}_{\bar{b}}\Pi^{\bar{b}}\otimes T_{\bar{a}}[/tex]
where I have let [itex]A=\{\{a\},\{\bar{a}\}\}[/itex]. This is the closest I can get to the given expression, but here I have [itex]\alpha_1 \phi_{JJ} = \alpha_1 \Pi^a \otimes T_a = \phi ^a_b\Pi^b\otimes T_a[/itex], which doesn't seem to work. I am assuming the the [itex]\alpha_i[/itex] are simple scalars, which somehow is to do with [itex]\phi[/itex] being a "scalar 1-cochain".

I have a few more questions, but that will suffice for now -- hopefully this gets the ball rolling, and I can work them out myself, once I understand what's going on here.


Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
ianhoolihan is offline
Mar7-12, 01:20 PM
P: 145
Any help, or even incomplete hints in the right direction? Cheers

Register to reply

Related Discussions
In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix? Computers 14
Shankar 12.4.4 - "the" rotation matrix vs. "a" rotation matrix (tensor operators QM) Advanced Physics Homework 2
"Fun" Magnetic Scalar Potential Problem Advanced Physics Homework 1
BRS: Static Axisymmetric "Gravitationless" Massless Scalar Field Solutions Special & General Relativity 6
"Consider a surface S on which a scalar field f is defined" General Math 5