Mass under Wick Rotation?


by arivero
Tags: mass, rotation, wick
arivero
arivero is offline
#1
Mar12-12, 01:23 PM
PF Gold
arivero's Avatar
P: 2,885
Is there some agreement about if the Wick rotation must produce exactly the same mass that the un-rotated equation, or is it more important to preserve some other quantity, say orbital momentum or whatever?

I am thinking on Hans' relativistic

[tex]
\beta^2 \over \sqrt {1-\beta^2}
[/tex]


because if we ask this quantity to be preserved up to sign, then the masses of W and Z are mapped to the (imaginary masses) of [candidate] Higgs boson and Top quark, which is pretty puzzling: 80.37 GeV becomes 122.38 i Gev and 91.187 GeV becomes 176.15 i GeV.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Mapping the road to quantum gravity
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
fzero
fzero is offline
#2
Mar12-12, 02:47 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,606
The Wick rotation preserves the spectrum, so it's not possible to change the masses of states. You are trading Lorentz invariance for Euclidean invariance, the values of the particular invariants will not change.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is Wick rotation necessary? Quantum Physics 17
wick rotation Quantum Physics 3
Wick rotation Quantum Physics 4
wick rotation General Physics 1