LaTeX Parentheses around mismatched size fractions in LaTeX

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolfbd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions Latex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around formatting a complex mathematical expression in LaTeX, specifically addressing issues with sizing brackets around fractions. The original expression has a fraction in the denominator that is causing spacing problems. Suggestions include using a matrix to align elements properly and employing the \vphantom{} command to adjust vertical alignment. It is also noted that switching from \dfrac to \frac can improve the appearance of the expression. Alternative representations for division, such as a/b, are mentioned as potentially clearer. Additionally, moving constants like 4π inside the parentheses can simplify the expression. Finally, using \bigl and \bigr instead of \left and \right is recommended for better control over bracket sizing.
wolfbd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a fraction in the denominator of another fraction, and I'm trying to put a set of brackets around it. However, I can't seem to get them to size properly. Example below:

Code:
 Q_1 \left[ \frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \dfrac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 } + Q_3 \right]

which comes out as

\begin{equation}
Q_1 \left[ \frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \dfrac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 } +Q_3\right]
\end{equation}

Obviously, I want to get rid of the space at the top. I've tried using \Bigg[ (which ends up too small) and even creating my own sizing in the preamble:
Code:
\makeatletter
\newcommand{\vast}{\bBigg@{4}}
\makeatother
(which ends up too big since it only accepts integer sizing, as far as I can tell). Any ideas? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can get the brackets right by putting the fraction inside a matrix.

That leaves the ##Q_1## in a silly place, but you can fix that with the \vphantom{} command. \vphantom{} works out the vertical height of what is inside the {}, and creates an invisible zero-width object of that size.

So, in front of the matrix in [ ] , make another matrix without backets, use \vphantom to make it the same height, and the ##Q_1## will line up with the ##Q_3##.

Code:
\begin{matrix}
\vphantom{\frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \dfrac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 }}
Q_1 
\end{matrix}
\begin{bmatrix} 
\frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \dfrac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 } + Q_3
\end{bmatrix}

$$\begin{matrix}
\vphantom{\frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \dfrac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 }}
Q_1
\end{matrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
\frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \dfrac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 } + Q_3
\end{bmatrix}$$

if you are a perfectionist, you might want to put a bit of negative space in between the two matrices as well.

Easy peasy. :devil:
 
Last edited:
wolfbd said:
\begin{equation}
Q_1 \left[ \frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \dfrac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 } +Q_3\right]
\end{equation}

One problem is that you are fighting LaTeX by using \dfrac. Simply changing to \frac improves things to some extent:

Q_1 \left[ \frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ \frac{Q_2\gamma A}{4\pi}} \right)^2 } + Q_3 \right]

There are other ways to represent division. Sometimes a/b looks better than \frac a b:
Q_1 \left[ \frac{Q_2}{4\pi \left( r_2+\sqrt{ (Q_2\gamma A)/(4\pi)} \right)^2 } + Q_3 \right]

You can pull the 4\pi inside the parentheses as \sqrt{4\pi}. This clears the denominator that is the root cause of your problems:
Q_1 \left[ \frac{Q_2}{\left( r_2\sqrt{4\pi}+\sqrt{Q_2\gamma A} \right)^2 } + Q_3 \right]

Sometimes \left and \right are too big. This is one of those times. Use \bigl and \bigr instead:
Q_1 \left[ \frac{Q_2}{\bigl( r_2\sqrt{4\pi}+\sqrt{Q_2\gamma A} \bigr)^2 } + Q_3 \right]
 

Similar threads

Back
Top