Help me understand these examples?

  • Thread starter Thread starter omoplata
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Example 5b from "A First Course in Probability" calculates the number of ways to divide ten children into two distinct teams of five, yielding 252 possible divisions, as the order matters. In contrast, Example 5c considers the same scenario but without distinguishing between teams, resulting in 126 divisions since the order is irrelevant. A participant challenges the book's interpretation, suggesting that in Example 5b, the same child could belong to both teams, leading to a different calculation. They argue that for Example 5c, since the teams compete against each other, the calculation should reflect the selection of one team, with the other team comprising the remaining children. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the context of team roles in determining the correct combinatorial approach.
omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
Examples 5b and 5c from "A First Course in Probability, 7th edition" by Sheldon Ross. Images of the relevant pages are attached.

EXAMPLE 5b
Ten children are to be divided into an A team and a B team of 5 each. The A team
will play in one league and the B team in another. How many different divisions are
possible?

Solution.
There are
10!/(5!.5!) = 252 possible divisions.

EXAMPLE 5c
In order to play a game of basketball, 10 children at a playground divide themselves
into two teams of 5 each. How many different divisions are possible?

Solution.
Note that this example is different from Example 5b because now the order
of the two teams is irrelevant. That is, there is no A and B team, but just a division
consisting of 2 groups of 5 each. Hence, the desired answer is
10!/(5!.5!.2!) = 126


I disagree.

I think for Example 5b the answer should be (10!/(5!.5!))*(10!/(5!.5!)). Because the teams A and B play in two different leagues, the same person can play in both teams. So there are 10C5 = 10!/(5!.5!) ways of choosing 5 people for team A, and the same number of ways for choosing 5 people for team B.

For example 5c, I think the answer should be 10C5 = 10!/(5!.5!). The two teams seem to be playing against each other, so no one can play both teams. So the number of ways of choosing the teams is just the number of way of choosing 5 people from 10. The remaining 5 will make up the other team.


But maybe the author of the book and I are not thinking along the same lines. Can someone point out my error and show me where I went wrong?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Ross1.jpeg
    Ross1.jpeg
    21.4 KB · Views: 716
  • Ross2.jpeg
    Ross2.jpeg
    23.9 KB · Views: 761
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The images look too small. If anyone wants a better image let me know. But the relevant problems are fully stated in the post.
 
Regarding the first question:

If I gave you 10 apples and asked you to divide them into 2 groups of 5 apples each, would you put any of the apples in both groups simultaneously?

Regarding the second question:

Even though the author says there's no A team and no B team, I think it helps in understanding the solution to suppose that there is an A team and a B team. C^{10}_5 is then the number of ways to choose 5 people specifically for team A, while the other 5 go to team B. But this approach treats the following, for example, as separate events:

Team A -- 1,2,3,4,5
Team B -- 6,7,8,9,10

and

Team A -- 6,7,8,9,10
Team B -- 1,2,3,4,5.

But in the context of the problem, there's no difference between these two events, since the two teams will be playing against each other. We need to divide out the number of ways of permuting the teams, which is 2!.
 
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top