Devices operated by both rechargeable battery and mains

AI Thread Summary
Many devices operate on both rechargeable batteries and mains power, but their functionality can vary significantly. Some devices, like radios, can work while charging, regardless of battery status, while others, such as shavers and trimmers, may require a fully charged battery to operate on mains power. This inconsistency may stem from the strength of the charger; weaker chargers may only provide a trickle charge insufficient for device operation. The arrangement of battery and mains power can also affect performance, as seen in examples where different chargers yield varying results in device functionality. Understanding these principles can clarify why certain devices behave differently when plugged in.
epenguin
Science Advisor
Messages
3,637
Reaction score
1,013
This may be in the 'you were afraid to ask' category.

There are many devices which work on batteries or alternatively when plugged into the mains. You can recharge the batteries. Obviously when you are using batteries alone they have to have been charged.

Now I am finding that while some devices (e.g. a radio) when attached to mains work equally well whether the battery is charged or not and think the charging goes on while you are using it, but others, particularly shavers and trimmers do not work, or hardly, on the mains until the battery is recharged which can take hours at least and can be inconvenient. I have just verified this experimentally. I do not remember that this ever used to happen.

Is my impression that things have changed in this respect accurate, or is my memory at fault? And in any case why are things like this now? What is the arrangement and principles? And if it has changed, why?

I would have thought it natural to put battery in parallel with mains supply (reduced and rectified in the device, the motor working with DC) and that is how it is done, but maybe I have some egregious misconceptions?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
epenguin said:
This may be in the 'you were afraid to ask' category.

There are many devices which work on batteries or alternatively when plugged into the mains. You can recharge the batteries. Obviously when you are using batteries alone they have to have been charged.

Now I am finding that while some devices (e.g. a radio) when attached to mains work equally well whether the battery is charged or not and think the charging goes on while you are using it, but others, particularly shavers and trimmers do not work, or hardly, on the mains until the battery is recharged which can take hours at least and can be inconvenient. I have just verified this experimentally. I do not remember that this ever used to happen.

Is my impression that things have changed in this respect accurate, or is my memory at fault? And in any case why are things like this now? What is the arrangement and principles? And if it has changed, why?

I would have thought it natural to put battery in parallel with mains supply (reduced and rectified in the device, the motor working with DC) and that is how it is done, but maybe I have some egregious misconceptions?

It mainly depends on how strong the recharger is. If it is using a trickle charge, then that is not usually enough to run the device.

A good example is the two charging devices that I have for my hand-held HAM radio. The home charger is a "wall wart" style transformer that is strong enough to charge the batteries and allow the radio to work in receive mode. But if you try to transmit (which takes a couple of amps), the wall charger is not strong enough, and the radio will not transmit.

The other charger that I have for that radio is a car cigarette lighter based unit. It passes power through from the car battery (with appropriate voltage regulation), and is easily strong enough to allow transmitting while charging up the radio's battery.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top