why KT phase transition is considered different from a second order phase transition?


by wdlang
Tags: considered, order, phase, transition
wdlang
wdlang is offline
#1
Sep11-12, 03:11 PM
P: 304
i cannot see the reason

what makes KT phase transition different from the ferro-para phase transition of the 2D ising model?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
atyy
atyy is offline
#2
Sep11-12, 06:09 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 8,005
There is no local order parameter in the KT transition, so it's "topological" rather than "symmetry breaking".

http://www.itp.uzh.ch/~llucas/projects/proseminar.pdf
http://www.phy.cuhk.edu.hk/course/20...transition.pdf
http://www.mit.edu/~levitov/8.334/notes/XYnotes1.pdf


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Landau theory: why does a m^3 term implies first order transition phase Classical Physics 4
Second-Order Phase Transition Classical Physics 2
First order phase transition (van der waals gas) Classical Physics 2
First order phase transition (van der waals gas) Advanced Physics Homework 1
Goldstone bosons 1st order phase transition Quantum Physics 13