Exploring the Difference between KT and Ferro-Para Phase Transitions

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
i cannot see the reason

what makes KT phase transition different from the ferro-para phase transition of the 2D ising model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There is no local order parameter in the KT transition, so it's "topological" rather than "symmetry breaking".

http://www.itp.uzh.ch/~llucas/projects/proseminar.pdf
http://www.phy.cuhk.edu.hk/course/2011-2012/1/phys5510/download/0/Ch11%20KT%20transition.pdf
http://www.mit.edu/~levitov/8.334/notes/XYnotes1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'How strong is the justification for low probability extreme thermal fluctuations?'

I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Similar threads

I Four Questions on vacuum phase transitions in the Universe...
Replies
29
Views
2K
A Is the cluster decomposition equivalent to no phase transitions?
Replies
16
Views
2K
A What do people mean by "dynamical phase transition"?
Replies
2
Views
990
A Noise in Landau–Zener transition
Replies
0
Views
769
I Does an electron have a quantum phase frequency?
Replies
36
Views
5K
A First Order in Time Derivatives + Phase Space
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Questions about Franck-Condon principle
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Hidden phase in polarization tests of Bell's inequality?
Replies
49
Views
5K
I Topological phase transitions for the whole Universe...?
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Criticality, phase transitions and closing bandgap
Replies
6
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top