Does time dilation only affect matter that has mass?

Milfeulle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does time dilation only affect matter that has mass?

For example, A spaceship is 1 light year away from Earth at rest. It sent out a radio wave to Earth then travels at 99.99% of the speed of light. On Earth, from our perspective, we will receive that radio wave 1 year later but the spaceship arrives 70 years later. If that spaceship speed up to 99.999999% of the speed of light, it will take 7000 years from our perspective to see that spaceship.
As a result, from our perspective, the faster that ship travels, the later it arrives, how does that makes sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Milfeulle said:
A spaceship is 1 light year away from Earth at rest. It sent out a radio wave to Earth then travels at 99.99% of the speed of light. On Earth, from our perspective, we will receive that radio wave 1 year later but the spaceship arrives 70 years later.
You have the dilation the wrong way round. The spaceship arrives just over 1 year later by Earth's clocks, but 1/70 year later by the ship's own clocks.
 
Ahh I see, I got the wrong way around all this time! Thanks for the reply!
 
DrGreg said:
You have the dilation the wrong way round. The spaceship arrives just over 1 year later by Earth's clocks, but 1/70 year later by the ship's own clocks.

So that means it only took the ship 5.21 days to arrive on Earth (from the spaceship's perspective) ? If so, that means if the spaceship can travel at 99.9999999999999% of the speed of light, it will only takes 1.41 second to arrive on Earth from the spaceship's perspective. It would be almost like... instantaneous travel...?
In another word, From the light's perspective, all that light from the Big Bang 14 billion years ago was already spread out everywhere in the Universe since the beginning and what we're seeing are just the trails it left behind?
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top