Equation utility function help

  • Thread starter Thread starter surferbarney0729
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Utility
AI Thread Summary
The utility function discussed is U = ln(2C), where C represents consumption. The individual has an annual income of $40,000 and faces a 2% risk of a $30,000 loss from an accident. The expected utility calculated is 11.262, leading to a certain wealth equivalent of approximately $38,906.20. This amount indicates the maximum willingness to pay for insurance, which is $1,093.80. An alternative perspective suggests using the utility of expected consumption, resulting in a willingness to pay of $600 instead.
surferbarney0729
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I understand the idea of the questio, but am perplexed as what to put in the equation to get it to equal $38906.20

Here is the question and answer
Your utility function is U = ln(2C) where C is the amount of consumption you have in
any given period. Your income is $40,000 per year and there is a 2% chance that you
will be involved in a catastrophic accident that will cost you $30,000 next year

I have solved the first parts, and EU is 11.262, but the last section is confusing me

What is the most that you would be willing to pay for insurance, given your utility
function?

To answer this question, first go back to the original utility to determine how much
money would yield the same utility as the expected utility of taking the risk. The wealth
that would yield utility of 11.262 solves ln(2W) = .98ln(80,000) + .02ln(20,000), so W =
exp(.98ln(80,000) + .02ln(20,000))/2 ≈ $38,906.20. You are indifferent between the risky
situation and certain wealth of $38,906.20 because they yield the same utility. Therefore,
you should be willing to pay $40,000 – 38,906.20 = $1,093.80 for insurance.

Any help on what my equation needs to look like to get 38,906.20?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me like you solved it. Can you clarify what your question is?

By the way, you are looking at expected utility. I could argue that the more correct method is utility of expected consumption. In that case I would be willing to pay $600.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'In the early days of electricity, they didn't have wall plugs'
Hello scientists, engineers, etc. I have not had any questions for you recently, so have not participated here. I was scanning some material and ran across these 2 ads. I had posted them at another forum, and I thought you may be interested in them as well. History is fascinating stuff! Some houses may have had plugs, but many homes just screwed the appliance into the light socket overhead. Does anyone know when electric wall plugs were in widespread use? 1906 ad DDTJRAC Even big...

Similar threads

Back
Top