Orthochorous? Don't think I've heard that term before

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
10,876
Reaction score
423
An arbitrary Lorentz transformation ##\Lambda## in 1+1 dimensions can be written as
\begin{align}
\Lambda=\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}
\begin{pmatrix}1 & -v\\ -\rho v & \rho\end{pmatrix}.
\end{align} Here ##\sigma=\operatorname{sgn}\Lambda_{00}## and ##\rho=\det\Lambda##. I learned today that ##\Lambda## is said to be orthochorous if ##\sigma\rho=1##. I don't think I've ever heard that term before. (I found it in Streater & Wightman...which by the way is the second hit if I google the term). Can someone explain this term? Is it standard? What does the "chorous" part refer to? Now that I think about it, I realize that I don't even know what "ortho" means, so I wouldn't mind getting that explained too.

And no, I'm not misspelling "orthochronous". :smile: This is a different word.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In thermodynamics, an 'isochoric' process is one where the volume remains constant, so I'm guessing 'chorous' in orthochorous means volume. And ρ = det Λ is the factor by which the transformation changes volumes.
 
Last edited:
Orthochorous is another subgroup where orthochronus preserves the direction of time. Orthochorus preserves the sign of the volume of space (Lorentz transformations)

http://books.google.ca/books?id=RfR...=0CEMQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=orthochorous&f=false

this link has some of the various subgroups and mathematics involved

edit : its kind of strange that one can find dozens of links describing the subgroups orthochronous, proper, and restricted but finding coverage of orthochorous is almost non existant.
 
Last edited:
Mordred said:
section 6.3 of this article covers some of the sub groups, took a bit to find it hope that helps
It might, but I think I understand the subgroups well enough. I'm mainly concerned with the terminology right now.

Based on what you guys said, it seems likely that some form of the word "chorous" means "volume". Thanks both of you.
 
Well, as per original ancient Greek, it doesn't

<Etymology

The noun isochor and the adjective isochoric are derived from the Greek words ἴσος (isos) meaning "equal", and χώρος (choros) meaning "space."> (from here).

Also χῶρος LSJ, Middle Liddell, Slater, Autenrieth 2.422 0 a definite space, piece of ground, place
χώρα LSJ, Middle Liddell, Slater 15.125 2 space

In addition
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/definitionlookup?type=begin&q=volume&target=greek
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top