Register to reply

Young's Modulus of Elasticity Problems -

by joe465
Tags: elasticity, modulus, urgent, young
Share this thread:
joe465
#1
Apr22-13, 04:02 PM
P: 94
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Calculate Young's Modulus of Elasticity for the three materials using the graphs only.

Stress (N/m2) Strain
70 0.06
100 0.11
150 0.22
200 0.35
220 0.48


2. Relevant equations

ε = Stress / Strain

3. The attempt at a solution

I believed that to calculate Young's Modulus was a case of stress over strain but surely it should give the same value throughout the elastic region to be a constant. The stress and strain results provided must be correct as they were already provided.

70 / 0.06 = 1166.66
100 / 0.11 = 909.09
150 / 0.22 = 681.82
200 / 0.35 = 571.43
220 / 0.48 = 458.33

So my main question is why are these so different, am i applying an incorrect formulae. Please note i was only using the formulae because i wanted to check i was getting it right and wasn't sure how to use the graphs to obtain the value.

How do a derive the youngs modulus from a Stress-Strain graph?

Please help as i only have 1 more day before this is due in.

Many thanks, Joe
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Scientists discover RNA modifications in some unexpected places
Scientists discover tropical tree microbiome in Panama
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
CWatters
#2
Apr22-13, 04:33 PM
P: 3,246
Not my field but I found this which suggests the curve isn't allways straight...



Presumably the Youngs modulus normally quoted is the slope at the bottom left in the elastic region.

Perhaps wait for other suggestions.
CWatters
#3
Apr22-13, 04:41 PM
P: 3,246
Do you know what the material is? What units for strain?..

I ask because a youngs modulus of 1000 N/m2 seems quite low..

For example this page quotes that of rubber as 0.01 * 109 to 0.1 * 109 N/m2

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/yo...lus-d_417.html

joe465
#4
Apr22-13, 05:13 PM
P: 94
Young's Modulus of Elasticity Problems -

That is the lowest values that were pre-given, the other 2 materials are

Stress Strain E
50000000 0.00128 39062500000
100000000 0.0016 62500000000
150000000 0.00187 80213903743
200000000 0.00213 93896713615
250000000 0.00227 1.10132E+11
300000000 0.00253 1.18577E+11
350000000 0.00339 1.03245E+11
375000000 0.00427 87822014052
400000000 0.00707 56577086280


Stress Strain E
100000000 0.00109 91743119266
200000000 0.00145 1.37931E+11
300000000 0.00182 1.64835E+11
400000000 0.00215 1.86047E+11
470000000 0.00236 1.99153E+11
460000000 0.00273 1.68498E+11
460000000 0.00291 1.58076E+11
500000000 0.00318 1.57233E+11
550000000 0.00382 1.43979E+11
600000000 0.00436 1.37615E+11



The idea of the assignment is to calculate the modulus of E and then research into what materials they could be. I'm going to presume the one i have already given would be something such as glass, which would explain why its so different.

I'm meant to calculate the E from the graphs that i have anyway, how do i go about this?

I thought modulus was meant to be a consistant number across the whole elastic region so why does it change??

Thanks
SteamKing
#5
Apr22-13, 06:34 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 6,727
Not every material has a perfectly elastic region in its stress-strain curve.
joe465
#6
Apr22-13, 06:37 PM
P: 94
So what value would i use for the elasticity since there so different, would i have to take an average?
Chestermiller
#7
Apr22-13, 09:32 PM
Mentor
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,375
Show us what the stress-strain graphs look like. (Strain = abscissa, Strain = ordinate). Seeing the graphs by eyeball should tell a lot.

Chet
SteamKing
#8
Apr22-13, 11:44 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 6,727
strain = abscissa, stress = ordinate
joe465
#9
Apr23-13, 02:24 AM
P: 94




http://imageshack.us/f/194/materialx.jpg/
http://imageshack.us/f/38/materialy.jpg
http://imageshack.us/f/209/materialz.jpg

There are the three stress-strain graphs
Chestermiller
#10
Apr23-13, 06:55 AM
Mentor
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,375
Quote Quote by SteamKing View Post
strain = abscissa, stress = ordinate
Hi. Thanks for the correction.

Chet
Chestermiller
#11
Apr23-13, 07:04 AM
Mentor
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,375
Please include the strain and stress 0,0 on these arithmetic scale plots. Also, maybe you can provide plots of log(stress) vs. log(strain) so we can see the behavior expanded at small strains (of course without the point 0,0 on the log-log plot). Please also show the data points on the plots.

These plots that you have shown so far are already very revealing.
joe465
#12
Apr23-13, 07:35 AM
P: 94
Thankyou, my initial task was to calculate the CSA which i did at 0.00002m2. I was pre-given Load and Extension data for 2 materials and given Stress-Strain data for the third. I was tasked to calculate the stress-strain data for all three and then plot the relevant graphs.

Material X

TEST DATA FOR X
LOAD..EXT...CSA.........Stress (F/A)..Strain........Orig Length E (Stress / strain)
1000..0.48...0.00002....50000000.....0.00128............375...390625000 00
2000..0.6....0.00002.....100000000...0.0016..............375...62500000 000
3000..0.7....0.00002.....150000000...0.001866667......375...80357142857
4000..0.8....0.00002.....200000000...0.002133333......375...93750000000
5000..0.85..0.00002......250000000..0.002266667......375....1.10294E+11
6000..0.95..0.00002.....300000000..0.002533333.......375....1.18421E+11
7000..1.27..0.00002.....350000000..0.003386667.......375....1.03346E+11
7500..1.6....0.00002.....375000000..0.004266667.......375....8789062500 0
8000..2.65..0.00002.....400000000..0.007066667........375....5660377358 5
8500..5.5...0.00002......425000000..0.014666667.......375....2897727272 7
8300..7......0.00002......415000000..0.018666667.......375....222321428 57
8000..7.9....0.00002.....400000000..0.021066667.......375.....189873417 72
7000..8.7....0.00002.....350000000..0.0232...............375.....150862 06897
6100..9.1....0.00002.....305000000..0.024266667......375......125686813 19

Material Y

TEST DATA FOR Y
LOAD...EXT...CSA......... Stress.........Strain..........Orig Length....E (Stress / strain
2000....0.6...0.00002.....100000000..0.001090909.......550...9166666666 7
4000....0.8...0.00002.....200000000..0.001454545.......550....1.375E+11
6000...1......0.00002.....300000000..0.001818182.......550...1.65E+11
8000...1.18..0.00002.....400000000..0.002145455.......550....1.86441E+1 1
9400....1.3...0.00002.....470000000..0.002363636.......550...1.98846E+1 1
9200...1.5...0.00002.....460000000..0.002727273.......550...1.68667E+11
9200...1.6...0.00002.....460000000..0.002909091.......550....1.58125E+1 1
10000.1.75..0.00002.....500000000..0.003181818.......550....1.57143E+11
11000.2.1...0.00002.....550000000..0.003818182.......550...1.44048E+11
12000.2.4...0.00002.....600000000..0.004363636.......550...1.375E+11
14000.5.....0.00002.....700000000..0.009090909.......550....77000000000
12000.7.2..0.00002.....600000000..0.013090909......550....45833333333
10000.7.25.0.00002.....500000000..0.013181818.......550...37931034483
8000...7.27..0.00002.....400000000..0.013218182.......550....3026134800 6

For Material Z only the Stress-Strain data was given already

TEST DATA FOR Z
Stress...Strain.......CSA................................E (Stress / strain)
70...... 0.06..........0.00002........................... 1166.666667
100.... 0.11 ..........0.00002...........................909.0909091
150.... 0.22 ..........0.00002..........................681.8181818
200.... 0.35 ..........0.00002..........................571.4285714
220.... 0.48..........0.00002...........................458.3333333

You have asked for 0,0 data but i was not given any data close to that amount. Should i still include this on the graphs and just start the line from thin air essentially.

Is my use of formulae correct. Should i change the scale data on my graphs?
Chestermiller
#13
Apr23-13, 08:33 AM
Mentor
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,375
The point 0,0 is known to be an exact point on your graph. If there is no applied stress, then there is no strain, and vice versa. I asked for the results on a log-log plot because it will increase the resolution in the region of small strains where the stress-strain behavior is expected to be linear. On a log-log plot, the linear stress-strain region should have a slope of 45 degrees (assuming equal spacing of the decades in the horizontal and vertical axes). If you are using a graphics package, just change the scales from arithmetic to logarithmic. And if you are switching to log scales, make sure you omit the point 0,0.

Chet
joe465
#14
Apr23-13, 08:43 AM
P: 94
So your suggesting the graph starts in mid air? I'm not sure what you mean but i'm confident i have to use arithmetic graphs and not log. Do i just use the gradient to determine Young's Modulus? So Change in Y axis / Change in X axis?

I have very little time left to get this done, i need to get a value and find the material.

Thanks, Joe
Chestermiller
#15
Apr23-13, 08:59 AM
Mentor
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,375
Quote Quote by joe465 View Post
So your suggesting the graph starts in mid air? I'm not sure what you mean but i'm confident i have to use arithmetic graphs and not log. Do i just use the gradient to determine Young's Modulus? So Change in Y axis / Change in X axis?

I have very little time left to get this done, i need to get a value and find the material.

Thanks, Joe
I'm not suggesting that the graph starts in mid air. I'm suggesting that there is an exact point on the graph at 0,0. How much was the strain before any stress was applied? Zero, right?

If you don't want to use log scales, then you need to zoom in on the data at small strains and stresses. To do this, omit the data points that are well beyond the linear region, and, by doing so, expand the scales on both axes. Then you will get a better eyeball view of what is happening at small strains.

Chet
Chestermiller
#16
Apr23-13, 09:15 AM
Mentor
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,375
I plotted up your data for two of the cases, and, in both cases, the data is offset along the strain axis. Otherwise, the data is pretty linear in the region of small strains, and you should be able to get a pretty accurate determination of the Young's modulus. I don't know why your data is offset along the strain axis.

Chet
joe465
#17
Apr23-13, 09:20 AM
P: 94
Thankyou, all the Load and extension data was provided. The area i believe to be correct and i'm confident my calculations are correct so any idea what to do now?
Chestermiller
#18
Apr23-13, 09:37 AM
Mentor
Chestermiller's Avatar
P: 5,375
Quote Quote by joe465 View Post
Thankyou, all the Load and extension data was provided. The area i believe to be correct and i'm confident my calculations are correct so any idea what to do now?
The graphs are "screaming" that something is wrong with the strains. This must mean that something was wrong with the extension measurements. This must somehow be related to the zero point of the extension measurements.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Elasticity and Young's Modulus Introductory Physics Homework 1
Determine the modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio and the shear modulus. Introductory Physics Homework 1
Young's Modulus for Plastic General Physics 9
Urgent help Young modulus how to hold masses Introductory Physics Homework 7
Elasticity and young's modulus Introductory Physics Homework 3