Can G be Written as a Matrix of Matrices like H?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the matrix G, defined as G = H^H(HH^H + αI)^{-1}, can be expressed in a similar block matrix structure as H. The matrix H is composed of square matrices A and B, with A being a diagonal matrix of real numbers. Initial simulations suggest that G maintains a similar structure, but a mathematical proof is sought to confirm this. The inquiry emphasizes the need for a rigorous approach to validate the observed pattern in G's structure. The conversation highlights the intersection of linear algebra and matrix theory in exploring the properties of these matrices.
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

I have the following matrix of matrices

\mathbf{H}=\begin{array}{cc}\mathbf{A}&\mathbf{B}\\\mathbf{B}^H&\mathbf{A}\end{array}

where each element is a square matrix, A is a diagonal matrix of real numbers, whereas B is not (necessarily), and the superscript H means conjugate transpose.

Now I have the following matrix

\mathbf{G}=\mathbf{H}^H(\mathbf{H}\mathbf{H}^H+\alpha\mathbf{I})^{-1}

where 'alpha' and 'I' are a constant scalar and the identity matrix, respectively. Will this matrix exhibit the same structure as H. In other words, can we write G as:

\mathbf{G}=\begin{array}{cc}\mathbf{A}_G & \mathbf{B}_G \\ \mathbf{B}^H_G &\mathbf{A}_G \end{array}

Via simulation it looks like it does, but I am wondering how to prove this mathematically?

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe this will help:
img11.gif


Source: http://www.cs.nthu.edu.tw/~jang/book/addenda/matinv/matinv/
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top