Question regarding y-axis units in FFT

  • Thread starter lennybogzy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Fft Units
In summary, the y-axis units in FFT refer to the amplitudes or magnitudes of the frequency components in a given signal. These units can vary depending on the type of FFT being used, such as power or decibels, and can also represent different physical quantities, such as voltage or sound pressure level. It is important to pay attention to the y-axis units in FFT analysis to accurately interpret and compare frequency spectra.
  • #1
lennybogzy
94
0
Hi all,

Havent turned to this forum in quite some time but hoping you might be able to explain to me my y-axis in the audio FFT I have below. How should I understand the units of dB/20u Pa? Ideally I want to convert this into dBa or something, I'm just not sure how to get a "feel" for this.

Could someone explain this to me like I'm 5?

Thanks, smart people.

FFT is https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=703574 in case anyone cares
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
The units are acoustic decibels (dB). The reference value for the dB ratio shown is 20 micropascals..the standard reference for sound pressure level. When you ask the analyser display the units in the dB scale, you usually have to define the reference level it uses to perform the dB calculation.

So basically it's telling you what the sound pressure level is in dB, most likely using a linear scale.

I'm not a B&K Pulse user, but it shouldn't be difficult for you to select an A weighting option. You can possibly do this by applying a weighting to the front end, so the signal is weighted before you do any more processing on it, or you should be able to apply weighting to the already measured signal you're showing with a post processing feature.

I'm assuming you're familiar with the A weighting scale (vs a linear scale).

B&K has excellent tech support...see if you have on-line help available with the pulse system you're using, or call B&K directly.

Do you have a microphone calibrator? That's also an easy way to check if your measurement is reasonable (not to mention recommended practice before taking measurements).
 
  • #3
Hey, thanks a lot Dave. This is exactly the info I was looking for. Acoustic testing is brand new for me so I really appreciate this.

Unfortunately this software is new to everyone and all the data I have is in screenshot mode only due to time constraints.

A few questions, since you're clearly knowledgeable about this:

1. Anything above 0dB is "hearable" and anything below is not?

2. Assuming I'm interested in one or a few particular frequencies, I should be able to take those peaks and "plug in" the freq. and peak to get the gain and calculate dBA? (If I reference a curve such as http://www.sengpielaudio.com/WeightingsA-And-C.gif)

In this case 3.2KHz is the area of concern. It looks like the peak should actually be amplified if I convert into dBA. Correct?

Anyway, again, thanks a lot. Much appreciated!
 
  • #4
Hi,

1. More or less... 20uPa is generally accepted as the threshold of hearing, so given that, 0 dB would be the lower limit for hearing...but it varies from person to person... age, exposure, etc... depends how picky you need to be with the application of that concept
2. I think that could work.. you have to be careful when interpreting very peaky type signals however... I don't normally convert between narrowband and 1/3 octave measurements, but you might see a difference using those two measurement options for the same source
3, Yes, it would, however it's only a few dB...so not a huge difference...again, how precise do you need to be... what's the application etc? Just looking at the curve, you see the real effect of the A weighting is at the lower frequencies... where you can see 10 dB differences or more.. so that's really significant. It's difficult for humans to identify a difference in perceived loudness between two narrowband sources that vary by less than 2 dB or so.
Plus, you may have other factors that muddy the waters... test to test repeatibility... how much variation do you see with that? Mic positioning... move the mic and see how your measured values change... directionality...is the source directional at all? As you move up in the frequency range, not all acoustic sources propogate sound evenly (like the waves from a pebble dropped into a pond)...
 
  • #5


Hi there,

Thanks for reaching out to the forum. The y-axis units in an audio FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) plot are typically represented in decibels (dB). This unit is used to measure the amplitude or loudness of a sound wave. In your case, the units are dB/20u Pa, which stands for decibels per 20 micro Pascals. This is a common unit used in acoustics to measure sound pressure level.

To put it simply, the y-axis on your FFT plot is showing how loud the sound is on a logarithmic scale. The higher the value, the louder the sound. As for converting to dBa, this is a unit that measures sound pressure level adjusted for human hearing sensitivity. To convert from dB/20u Pa to dBa, you can use a conversion factor of 2.2 dB. So, if your FFT plot shows a value of 40 dB/20u Pa, it would be equivalent to 88 dBa.

I hope this helps explain the units on your FFT plot. Let me know if you have any further questions. Keep exploring and learning!

Best,

 

1. What do the units on the y-axis represent in an FFT graph?

The units on the y-axis in an FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) graph represent the amplitude or strength of a particular frequency component in the signal being analyzed. This can be thought of as the "loudness" of that particular frequency in the signal.

2. How are the units on the y-axis determined in an FFT graph?

The units on the y-axis in an FFT graph are determined by the scaling factor used in the transformation process. This scaling factor is typically chosen to normalize the FFT output to the same range as the input signal, making it easier to interpret the results.

3. Can the units on the y-axis be changed in an FFT graph?

Yes, the units on the y-axis in an FFT graph can be changed by adjusting the scaling factor used in the transformation process. This can be useful if the original signal has a specific unit of measurement, such as voltage or pressure, that you would like to retain in the FFT graph.

4. How can I interpret the units on the y-axis in an FFT graph?

The units on the y-axis in an FFT graph can be interpreted as a measure of the signal's spectral content. This means that higher values on the y-axis correspond to a larger amplitude of a particular frequency in the signal, while lower values indicate a lower amplitude for that frequency. The overall shape and distribution of the graph can also provide insights into the signal's frequency composition.

5. Are the units on the y-axis the same for all FFT graphs?

No, the units on the y-axis in an FFT graph can vary depending on the specific signal being analyzed and the scaling factor used. It is important to carefully examine the units and scaling used in each FFT graph before making comparisons or drawing conclusions.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
16K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top