Understanding Density of States in 3d Crystals: A Comprehensive Explanation

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
My book gives a treatment of this problem for crystal vibrations, but I don't really understand it. It says: There is one allowed value of K per volume (2\pi/L)3. But at the same time it has just shown that Kx,Ky,Kz can take values ±2\pi/L which would certainly lead to more combinations of Kx,Ky,Kz within the volume confined by (2\pi/L)3. What am I misunderstanding.
Also: applying periodic boundary conditions yields the condition that Kx,Ky,Kz=±n2\pi/L, while fixed ends yielded K=n\pi/L, but my book says the two approaches yield identical results. How is that??
 

Attachments

  • ds.png
    ds.png
    53.8 KB · Views: 492
Physics news on Phys.org
if you read the sentence without pausing, the meaning is slightly different.
"There is one allowed value of K per volume , for each polarization and for each branch."
so there are multiple K values allowed per volume
 
Well in this context, what does the word branch refer to? Different combinations of Kx,Ky,Kz?
 
No, same combination of kx,ky,kz may correspond to different states with different energies.
Look at the acoustic and optic branch in a 1D chain with two types of atoms. This is the simplest example of "branches".
Here for each k there are two energies (or frequencies).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top