Can the Span Efficiency Factor Exceed 1 in the Lifting-Line Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter truffaldino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Span
AI Thread Summary
The span efficiency factor in the lifting-line theory, which describes the lift and vortex drag of finite wings, is traditionally capped at 1, with elliptical wings being the most efficient. However, it is possible for the efficiency factor to exceed 1 when moving beyond the lifting-line approximation. This can be achieved through design innovations such as tandem wings, boxed wings, or the incorporation of winglets. These methods allow for induced drag to be lower than that predicted for an elliptical wing, assuming similar aspect ratios and lift coefficients while neglecting viscous effects. Ultimately, while exceeding a span efficiency factor of 1 is unconventional, it is feasible with specific wing designs.
truffaldino
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello Everybody,

Span efficiency factor appears in the lifting-line theory of Prandtl describing Lift and vortex drag of a finite wing. According to this theory, the most efficient wing is an elliptical one and, roughly speaking, the span efficiency factor defines an efficiency of a given wing planform relatively to elliptic wing.

In the framework of the lifting line theory the span efficiency cannot exceed 1.

My question is: can this efficiency factor be more than 1, when going beyound lifting-line approximation ? (sorry for abusing notion of efficiency which supposed to be less <= 1).

In other words: does it exist such a wing whose induced drag is less than that of estimate for elliptic wing in the lifting-line theory (provided aspect ratios and lift coefficients are the same and viscous effects, such as skin friction and boundary layer, are neglected).

Thanks
Truffaldino
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Short answer is yes, you can have a >1 efficiency factor. But you have to cheat. It's accomplished by using tandem wings or boxed wings. Winglets also allow for a >1 factor.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
27K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
16K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
11K
Back
Top