Quantum Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers by Miller

AI Thread Summary
"Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers" by David A. B. Miller is highly recommended for engineers seeking a practical understanding of quantum mechanics (QM). The book is well-written and effectively teaches QM with a focus on applications, making it comparable to established texts like Shankar and Griffiths. It begins by addressing the relevance of QM in engineering design, which sets a practical tone. While the book has substantial coverage suitable for introductory physics courses, it is suggested as a complementary resource rather than a primary text for aspiring physicists. Overall, it is a valuable resource for those looking to grasp QM in a context relevant to engineering.

For those who have used this book

  • Strongly Recommend

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Lightly recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lightly don't recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly don't recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Physics news on Phys.org
I won't cast a vote until I'm done reading it, but I was recommended this book by an engineering prof I know, and it's been really good so far. It's well-written, and it seems to teach you QM "properly," at a level which is at least comparable to books like Shankar and Griffiths, but with more of a mind on applications than those books. The very first chapter of the book tries to motivate the subject by answering the question "when do engineers actually need to know QM in order to design stuff?"

Based on what I've read so far, I would definitely reccomend this to any engineer who wants to learn QM "properly."

He says in the preface that the coverage and depth are substantial enough that it could be used as an introductory text for physicists. While I think he's right that you could use it, I don't think it's really the best book for that purpose. I would still recommend this book to aspiring physicists, but I would reccomend it as a complement to one of the standard books (like Shankar, for example) rather than as a core text.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top