DM Exclusion Plots: Investigating WIMP Mass & Cross Section Relations

  • Thread starter Thread starter tryhard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between WIMP mass and cross-section in dark matter exclusion plots. It highlights that the cross-section is proportional to the square of the ratio of reduced masses, suggesting a monotonically increasing function. However, this contrasts with the behavior of DM exclusion plots, which initially decrease before increasing. The conversation emphasizes that exclusion plots are based on experimental detector sensitivity, which varies with different WIMP masses and energy depositions. Additionally, the predicted WIMP flux is crucial for relating event rates to cross-sections, indicating a complex interplay between theory and experimental data.
tryhard
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been working hard to get the Dark Matter exclusion plots.

In most of the papers (arxiv:0808.3607), I found that the relation betweem WIMP mass and WIMP cross section is :

σ is directly proportional to (μ/μp)^2

σ=cross section
μ=reduced mass of WIMP and target nucleus
μp=reduced mass of WIMP and proton.

This clearly gives a monotonically increasing function, which is unlike the DM exclusion plot, which decreases to some value and then increases. Where am I going wrong ??
 
Space news on Phys.org
Exclusion plots are directly targeted at the cross-section - they don't depend on theory predictions for this value. For exclusion plots from experiments, you have to consider the detector sensitivity. Different WIMP masses lead to different energy depositions in the detector, and larger values are easier to detect. On the other hand, the predicted WIMP flux (to relate event rates with a cross-section) depends on the mass of the particle.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top