Approximation of values from non-closed form equation.

AI Thread Summary
The equation 1 = cos²(b)[1-(c-b)²] is presented for approximation, with c > π, and the user seeks a method to find b to 5-6 digits of accuracy. It is noted that a closed-form solution for b is unlikely. Newton's method is suggested as a viable approach for iteration, using the formula x_{n+1} = x_n - f(x_n)/f'(x_n). The discussion highlights that for real solutions, the condition tan²(b) = -(c-b)² leads to the conclusion that c must equal b, specifically c = nπ. The conversation emphasizes the importance of iterative methods for approximating solutions in non-closed form equations.
Legaldose
Messages
73
Reaction score
6
Hello everyone, I'm working on a problem and it turns out that this equation crops up:

1 = cos^{2}(b)[1-(c-b)^{2}]

where

c > \pi

Now I'm pretty sure you can't solve for b in closed form (at least I can't), so what I need to do is for some value of c, approximate the value of b to about 5-6 digits of accuracy. I just need tips to head in the right direction. Anything will be useful. Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1 = cos^{2}(b)[1-(c-b)^{2}]
1-cos^{2}(b) = cos^{2}(b)[-(c-b)^{2}]
sin^{2}(b) = cos^{2}(b)[-(c-b)^{2}]
tan^{2}(b) = -(c-b)^{2}
For real solution, positive term = negative term is only possible if they are =0.
Hence the solution is : c=b=n\pi
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh okay, thanks JJacquelin, I didn't even think to do this.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top