- #1
Suzanne Rosenzweig
- 4
- 0
- TL;DR Summary
- Running through a derivation of plasma frequency, not sure why we can drop imaginary part.
Background of problem comes from Drude model of a metal (not necessary to answer my problem but for the curious): Consider a uniform, time-dependent electric field acting on a metal. It can be shown that the conductivity is $$\sigma = \frac{\sigma_0}{1-i\omega t}$$ where $$\sigma_0 = \frac{ne\tau^2}{m}.$$ From Maxwell's equations, we can get a wave equation of the form $$-\nabla^2\textbf{E} = \frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\epsilon(\omega)\textbf{E}$$ where the dielectric constant is $$\epsilon(\omega) = 1+\frac{4\pi i\sigma}{\omega}.$$ We can substitute into this equation the first two definitions provided (##\sigma## and ##\sigma_0##) and take the limit that ##\omega\tau \gg 1## to find, to a first approximation, that $$\epsilon(\omega) = 1 - \frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega^2}$$ where $$\omega_p^2 = \frac{4\pi ne^2}{m}.$$ Where I need help: The problem I have is that when I run through my derivation (plugging the expression for ##\sigma## and ##\sigma_0## into the equation for ##\epsilon(\omega)## and taking it to a first approximation since ##\omega\tau\gg1##), I can get the real part to agree with this expression but I can't reason why we can drop the imaginary part. The imaginary part I wind up with looks like this: $$\frac{4\pi i ne^2\tau}{m\omega(1+\omega^2\tau^2)}.$$ Why can we drop this without consequence?
Note: I put this in the Math forum because it's purely the mathematical reasoning I need help with but I provided the physics background for those interested.
Note: I put this in the Math forum because it's purely the mathematical reasoning I need help with but I provided the physics background for those interested.