Minimum capacity rate ratio of a heat exchanger

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the minimum capacity rate ratio (R) of a heat exchanger, specifically why R is calculated as zero. The term in question approaches infinity due to the specific heat of condensing steam, where the temperature change (Δθ) is zero, leading to an undefined ratio. Participants clarify that the problem indicates not all steam condenses, with both inlet and outlet temperatures on the steam side set at 125°C. There is also uncertainty about the parameters used for the mass flow rates (mc) and the ratio R in the solution. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of understanding heat exchanger calculations in thermodynamics.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the question:
2mDpOLz.png


I am confused about the solution. In the solution they found that the minimum capacity rate ratio R = C_min/C_max was zero. This is because of the term I circled in the red which I do not understand why it goes towards infinity.

Here is the solution:
HlcAc5j.png


Could someone please explain why that term goes to infinity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a subject I know anything about, but it seems to me that ch represents the specific heat of the condensing steam. Where the steam is condensing but not changing in temperature, specific heat = ΔQ/Δθ = ΔQ/0. That said, I'm sure some of the steam would be hotter than its condensate.
 
haruspex said:
That said, I'm sure some of the steam would be hotter than its condensate.

The problem statement (and the way they solve the problem) implies that not all the steam condenses. So the inlet and outlet temperatures on the steam side are supposed to be taken as 125 C. Regarding the line involving the red encircled portion, I have no idea what the max and min on (mc) or the parameter R are supposed to be used for. Anyway, the rest of the development makes perfect sense.

Chet
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top