How can gravitons be linked to general relativity?

haisydinh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi, this might be a silly question, but it does confuse me when I read about general relativity. From what I know about quantum mechanics, a force always needs a force carrier. For example photons are force-carriers for electric or magnetic force; the so-called ‘gravitons’ are the force-carriers for gravitational force. However, general relativity states that gravity is not a force; it’s just the effects of the bending of space-time near a massive object. So why do we need the graviton at all? In other words, how can the graviton be linked to the bending of space-time?

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you take GR in the weak gravitational limit (e.g., like Newtonian gravity), and quantize it ... you find these spin 2 bosons. These are what they call gravitons.

Whether or not they actually exist is another question.

But it is not quantum gravity, and it is not general relativity.
 
Tip: if you look down at the bottom of this page, you will find a list of "Related Discussions" with the very same (or nearly same) question that you asked. This is a rather frequently asked question here.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top