When to use gradient and when to use only one coordinate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between calculating acceleration from a velocity-time graph and resistance from a voltage-current graph. Acceleration is derived from the gradient of the tangent to the curve, reflecting the change in velocity over time. In contrast, resistance is calculated using the coordinates of a specific point, as resistance is defined by the ratio of voltage to current (R = V/I). The voltage difference across a resistor is related to the gradient, but it also involves the resistor's length and resistivity. Understanding these definitions clarifies why different methods are used for these physical quantities.
FaroukYasser
Messages
62
Reaction score
3
Hi,
I was wandering, sometimes in physics, to get acceleration from a velocity time graph, you would have to find the gradient of the tangent of the curve. But in other graphs like say Voltage current graph, if you want to find the resistance at any point (Which is V/I) you simply take the coordinate of that point and just divide Voltage by Current. Why is it that we took there the gradient of a tangent and here just the coordinates although in both the Gradient represented acceleration and Resistance.

Thanks :))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That depends on the definition of the physical quantity you're trying to calculate. resistance is defined as R =V/I while acceleration is defined as a=Δv/Δt.
 
FaroukYasser said:
Hi,
I was wandering, sometimes in physics, to get acceleration from a velocity time graph, you would have to find the gradient of the tangent of the curve. But in other graphs like say Voltage current graph, if you want to find the resistance at any point (Which is V/I) you simply take the coordinate of that point and just divide Voltage by Current. Why is it that we took there the gradient of a tangent and here just the coordinates although in both the Gradient represented acceleration and Resistance.

Thanks :))
In the case of voltage, resistance, and current, you don't divide the voltage by the current, you divided the voltage difference across the resistor by the current. The voltage difference across the resistor is equal to the voltage gradient times the length of the resistor. The resistance divided by the length of the resistor is equal to the resistivity times the cross sectional area. So the resistivity is equal to the voltage gradient divided by the current density.

chet
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top