Synge: optical observations in GR

  • Thread starter Thread starter pervect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Optical
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,410
Reaction score
1,588
A couple of questions about this paper, which, unfortunately, I can't access in is entirety
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02923262#page-1

1) Re: optical coordinates. From what I've read (here and some other sketchy sources), these are similar to fermi-normal coordinates, but one uses an affine parameterization along null geodesics passing through a point, rather than affine parameterizations along spacelike geodesics at a point. I was wondering if there was anyone out there who could tell me if I was on the right track here.

2) I'm rather curious about the bouncing-photon idea, which apparently can apparently do fermi-walker transport, but I haven't been able to find enough on the idea to figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These topics are both discussed in Synge's book, "Relativity: The General Theory", in which he devotes about 10 pages to each. Essentially he beats them both to death, in a power series expansion.

You're right about the definition of optical coordinates, and he goes on to calculate a power series approximation to the metric and the geodesics. For the bouncing photon, he shoots a photon out in some direction. In the small distance limit, if it's reflected and comes back to us in the "same" direction, then we are using Fermi-Walker transport to define "same". Once more he expands the results far enough to see the Riemann tensor and the curvature of the base line.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top