Emissivity of a flat surface varies with zenith angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the emissivity of a flat surface and its relationship with the zenith angle, expressed by the equation e=E*cos(theta). It is argued that varying emissivity leads to different emitted radiation levels, suggesting the surface acts as an anisotropic source. However, a counterpoint is made that the surface remains isotropic due to the cosine law, which only affects the projected area rather than the radiation uniformity. The key takeaway is that while emissivity changes with angle, it does not necessarily imply anisotropic radiation. The debate highlights the complexity of radiation behavior in relation to surface emissivity.
Callisto
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
If the emissivity of a flat surface varies with zenith angle according to

e=E*cos(theta)
where E is the emissivity at zenith.
Would this surface radiate isotropically?

I think that because the emissivity varies then the emitted radiation varies accordingly so the energy measured from any fixed point and at any angle would not be the same so therefore the surface would be an anisotropic source of radiation.

Does this sound like a fair argument?
anybody care to correct me?

Callisto
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Callisto said:
If the emissivity of a flat surface varies with zenith angle according to

e=E*cos(theta)
where E is the emissivity at zenith.
Would this surface radiate isotropically?

I think that because the emissivity varies then the emitted radiation varies accordingly so the energy measured from any fixed point and at any angle would not be the same so therefore the surface would be an anisotropic source of radiation.

Does this sound like a fair argument?
anybody care to correct me?

Callisto


No, the surface is an isotropic radiator. The cos law means the projected
area of the surface is being reduced. Any deviation from the cos variation
means it's not an isotropic radiator.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top