Design Analysis of Structural Elements: Mechanics of Materials Review

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the evaluation of the book "Design Analysis of Structural Elements" by James W. Dally and Robert J. Bonenberger, particularly in comparison to Hibbeler's textbooks on statics and mechanics of materials. The initial poster expresses disappointment with the Dally and Bonenberger book, noting its lack of depth in topics covered, especially in vector analysis and moments about specified axes. The poster appreciates Hibbeler's thoroughness and clarity, highlighting its rigorous approach and effective proofs. Responses suggest that Hibbeler's mechanics of materials book is a better choice for comprehensive study, while recommending the Dally and Bonenberger book as a supplementary resource for problem-solving. Overall, the consensus favors Hibbeler for its detailed coverage and effective teaching style in engineering subjects.
Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
Hey,

I just bought my book for mechanics of materials from the book store. Apparently its used in teaching statics and mechanics of materials all in one. I already took statics with Hibbeler, and I really did enjoy that book. It was VERY thorough. I looked through this books statics and felt very sad. A good majority of the stuff found in hibbeler was NOT found in this book, and I am willing to bet it will be severly lacking in material on mechanics of materials. I know hibbeler has a book on mech of mat, and I am very inclined to buy that and use this book as a paper weight and to solve the problems for homework only. :frown: Has anyone had any experience using this book: "Design analysis of structural elements fourth edition, James W. Dally and Robert J. Bonenberger"

Also, has anyone used hibbelers book on mechanics of materials?

No disrespect to the authors of this book, but they put a really nice hard cover, but when you open it up, the pictures and diagrams look like they were made in MS paint! But the main problem is it looks like it takes a very non rigerous approach to vector analysis. I could not find a single page on moments about a specified axis! YIKES!

I like hibbeler because its almost identical to beer/johnston, and they show good proofs using vectors.

any help is appreciated

Cyrus!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi Cyrus,

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the book "Design Analysis of Structural Elements" and your comparison to Hibbeler's book on mechanics of materials. As an engineering student, I understand the importance of having a thorough and comprehensive textbook that covers all the necessary topics in a clear and rigorous manner.

Based on your review, it seems like the book "Design Analysis of Structural Elements" may not be the best choice for studying mechanics of materials. It's important to have a textbook that covers all the topics and concepts in a detailed and organized manner, especially for subjects like mechanics of materials which require a strong foundation in statics.

I have not personally used the book "Design Analysis of Structural Elements", but I have used Hibbeler's book on mechanics of materials and found it to be very helpful. It covers all the necessary topics and has clear explanations and examples. The inclusion of vector analysis and proofs also adds to the rigor of the book, which is essential for understanding the subject.

In conclusion, I would recommend using Hibbeler's book for studying mechanics of materials and using "Design Analysis of Structural Elements" as a supplementary resource or for solving practice problems. As always, it's important to find the right resources that work best for you and your learning style. Good luck with your studies!
 
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top