Question about Einstein's train and lightning

  • Thread starter Thread starter robert Ihnot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lightning Train
Click For Summary
Einstein's thought experiment involving a long train and simultaneous lightning strikes at both ends illustrates the relativity of simultaneity. A ground observer perceives the lightning bolts as simultaneous, while an observer on the moving train sees them at different times due to the train's motion during the light travel time. The discussion highlights the application of the Lorentz transform, emphasizing that the momentum of the train is not relevant for the Galilean observer aboard. The confusion arises from the interpretation of light travel versus the actual lightning strikes, clarifying that light from the bolts reaches the observer, not the bolts themselves. This scenario underscores the fundamental principles of special relativity regarding the perception of time and simultaneity.
robert Ihnot
Messages
1,058
Reaction score
1
Einstein wrote about a long train that experienced bolts of lighting hitting on both ends. Einstein tells us that a midway observer on the ground would see both bolts at the same time, but the midway observer on the train would have moved off from the same ground point because of the time it takes the flash to travel.

Now if you look at this problem using the Lorentz transform, it is not true that momentum of the train is important to the Galilean observer aboard the train, writing for the transform C+V and C-V?

This problem would not occur for the ground observer, but there is still the question if the bolts came straight down on both ends of the train, how does the bolt now instantly travel at right angles to the ground to meet at the midpoint of the tracks?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
robert Ihnot said:
Einstein wrote about a long train that experienced bolts of lighting hitting on both ends. Einstein tells us that a midway observer on the ground would see both bolts at the same time, but the midway observer on the train would have moved off from the same ground point because of the time it takes the flash to travel.
The lightning bolts strike the ends of the train simultaneously according to the ground observers. And since, again according to the ground observers, the train moves during the time it takes light to travel to the midpoint observer, the light from each lightning bolt cannot reach the midway observer at the same time. From this one can deduce (by appealing to the principle that the speed of light is the same for all observers) that according to the train observers the light flashes were not simultaneous.

Now if you look at this problem using the Lorentz transform, it is not true that momentum of the train is important to the Galilean observer aboard the train, writing for the transform C+V and C-V?
I'm not sure what you are talking about here, since you mention Lorentz transforms and Galilean observers in the same breath. According to ground observers, the speed of the train is V and the speed of light is C. Thus according to ground observers the rate at which the light reaches the midpoint is C+V for one flash and C-V for the other.

This problem would not occur for the ground observer, but there is still the question if the bolts came straight down on both ends of the train, how does the bolt now instantly travel at right angles to the ground to meet at the midpoint of the tracks?
Think of the lightning bolts as flashes of light that occur at the ends of the train. The light emanates outward from each flash. (Just like turning on a light bulb.) The bolt doesn't travel to the midpoint, just the light from the bolt. (You can see a lightning bolt strike someplace miles away because the light travels from the bolt to your eyes. That doesn't mean the lightning bolt strikes you!)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 136 ·
5
Replies
136
Views
15K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K