How is this proof valid? ax(bxc) = (c.a)b-(b.a)c

by mr_coffee
Tags: axbxc, cabbac, proof, valid
mr_coffee is offline
Sep15-05, 08:51 PM
P: 1,629
Hello everyone, i'm looking at this proof and its making sence until the very last part, and it doens't friggin' work...the terms don't match up... Also is the notation I used correct in the proof, like does there have to be any vector notation I don't have or do you see anyhting you don't like? I'm proving the "The Vector triple product"
Here is my proof:
Look at the 2nd part of ax(bxc) -----> a1b1c3 - a2b22c3 + a2b3c2
then look at the last part ( - (b.a)c ---> a1b3c1 - a1b1c3 + a2b3c2 - a2b2c3

You see only 1 term isn't match up!! the a1b1c3 not equal to a1b3c1 whats going on? Thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior
mr_coffee is offline
Sep15-05, 10:16 PM
P: 1,629
Nevermind, my friend found the problem! I forgot a term in ax(bxc) part.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Valid method of proof? General Math 23
valid proof? Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
is this a valid proof? Calculus 2
Is this a valid proof? Introductory Physics Homework 4
How Valid is This Proof? General Math 2