Numerical Methods - Newton Raphson

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Newton-Raphson method for finding roots of functions, highlighting its application in both single-variable functions and systems of non-linear equations. A key example demonstrates how to compute the reciprocal of a number using the method, showcasing its efficiency by achieving quadratic convergence without division. The algorithm can also be adapted to compute Taylor series expansions for functions, allowing for rapid convergence in obtaining terms. Additionally, the technique is applicable for calculating logarithmic and exponential functions, emphasizing its versatility in handling complex mathematical expressions. Overall, the Newton-Raphson method proves to be a powerful tool for numerical analysis and function approximation.
hotvette
Homework Helper
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
11
The following 2 page example illustrates the use of the Newton-Raphson technique for solving for roots of functions. Examples included:

1. Function in a single variable
2. System of non-linear equations
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nicely formatted... great examples too; interesting to finally find something on its use with non-linear systems. :)
Thanks!
 
Thanks for the nice comments. My objective is to make things clear, concise, and practical. I need to see examples to understand things, so I figured others do also.:cool:
 
Division using Newton-Raphson. :smile:

We want to compute 1/y for some number y. This amounts to solving the equation:

<br /> \frac{1}{x} - y = 0<br />

for x. If we do that using Newton-Raphson, we get:

<br /> x_{n+1} = 2x_{n} - x_{n}^{2}y<br />

This is indeed a true division algorithm as it doesn't contain any divisions. Also, due to quadratic convergence, you double the number of significant digits at each step. Long division will only yield one significant digit per step.

The above algorithm can also be used to compute the Taylor series of a function 1/f(x) if the Taylor series of f(x) is known. You just take P_{0}(x) to be the first term of the expansion, e.g. if f(0) is nonzero then P_{0}=1/f(0) and you iterate using the algorithm:

<br /> P_{n+1}(x) = 2P_{n}(x) - P_{n}(x)^{2}f(x)<br />

At each step the number of correct terms will double, so P_{n}(x) will contain the first 2^{n} terms of the series expansion of 1/f(x). Note that this means that the term P_{n}(x)^{2}f(x) has to be computed to order \mathcal{O}\left(x^{2^{n+1}-1}\right).

So, computing the first billion terms of 1/f(x) only requires 30 iterations :smile: But we can do much more than computing reciprocals. Computing the series expansion of \log(f(x)) is almost as easy as computing the reciprocal of f(x) as all you have to do is integrate f&#039;(x)/f(x) term by term. And using this algorithm for \log(f(x)) you can also compute \exp\left(f(x)\right) using Newton-Raphson to solve for that function that yields f(x) after taking the logarithm using Newton-Raphson and the algorithm for computing the logarithm of a series expansion.

Since a large class of functions can be expressed in terms of logarithms and exponentials, the series expansion of pretty much any awkward function can be computed this way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top