Double slit

In modern physics, the double-slit experiment is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles; moreover, it displays the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical phenomena. This type of experiment was first performed, using light, by Thomas Young in 1801, as a demonstration of the wave behavior of light. At that time it was thought that light consisted of either waves or particles. With the beginning of modern physics, about a hundred years later, it was realized that light could in fact show behavior characteristic of both waves and particles. In 1927, Davisson and Germer demonstrated that electrons show the same behavior, which was later extended to atoms and molecules. Thomas Young's experiment with light was part of classical physics long before the development of quantum mechanics and the concept of wave-particle duality. He believed it demonstrated that the wave theory of light was correct, and his experiment is sometimes referred to as Young's experiment or Young's slits.

The experiment belongs to a general class of "double path" experiments, in which a wave is split into two separate waves that later combine into a single wave. Changes in the path-lengths of both waves result in a phase shift, creating an interference pattern. Another version is the Mach–Zehnder interferometer, which splits the beam with a beam splitter.In the basic version of this experiment, a coherent light source, such as a laser beam, illuminates a plate pierced by two parallel slits, and the light passing through the slits is observed on a screen behind the plate. The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing through the two slits to interfere, producing bright and dark bands on the screen – a result that would not be expected if light consisted of classical particles. However, the light is always found to be absorbed at the screen at discrete points, as individual particles (not waves); the interference pattern appears via the varying density of these particle hits on the screen. Furthermore, versions of the experiment that include detectors at the slits find that each detected photon passes through one slit (as would a classical particle), and not through both slits (as would a wave). However, such experiments demonstrate that particles do not form the interference pattern if one detects which slit they pass through. These results demonstrate the principle of wave–particle duality.Other atomic-scale entities, such as electrons, are found to exhibit the same behavior when fired towards a double slit. Additionally, the detection of individual discrete impacts is observed to be inherently probabilistic, which is inexplicable using classical mechanics.The experiment can be done with entities much larger than electrons and photons, although it becomes more difficult as size increases. The largest entities for which the double-slit experiment has been performed were molecules that each comprised 2000 atoms (whose total mass was 25,000 atomic mass units).The double-slit experiment (and its variations) has become a classic for its clarity in expressing the central puzzles of quantum mechanics. Because it demonstrates the fundamental limitation of the ability of the observer to predict experimental results, Richard Feynman called it "a phenomenon which is impossible […] to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery [of quantum mechanics]."

View More On Wikipedia.org
  • 761

    Greg Bernhardt

    A PF Singularity From USA
    • Messages
      19,443
    • Media
      227
    • Reaction score
      10,021
    • Points
      1,237
  • 3

    entropy1

    A PF Organism
    • Messages
      1,230
    • Reaction score
      71
    • Points
      196
  • 2

    Herbascious J

    A PF Cell From Oakland, CA, USA
    • Messages
      165
    • Reaction score
      7
    • Points
      131
  • 2

    greypilgrim

    A PF Cell
    • Messages
      515
    • Reaction score
      36
    • Points
      103
  • 2

    andrewkirk

    A PF Asteroid From Sydney, Australia
    • Messages
      4,119
    • Reaction score
      1,717
    • Points
      427
  • 1

    Dembara

    A PF Electron
    • Messages
      24
    • Reaction score
      1
    • Points
      11
  • 1

    Agrippa

    A PF Molecule
    • Messages
      78
    • Reaction score
      10
    • Points
      58
  • 1

    ronsa

    A PF Quark
    • Messages
      1
    • Reaction score
      0
    • Points
      1
  • 1

    jaketodd

    A PF Cell
    • Messages
      508
    • Reaction score
      21
    • Points
      118
  • 1

    Lozzalay

    A PF Quark
    • Messages
      2
    • Reaction score
      1
    • Points
      6
  • 1

    noahcharris

    A PF Electron
    • Messages
      21
    • Reaction score
      0
    • Points
      16
  • 1

    Jeronimus

    A PF Atom
    • Messages
      287
    • Reaction score
      9
    • Points
      46
  • 1

    whoareyou

    A PF Atom
    • Messages
      162
    • Reaction score
      2
    • Points
      36
  • 1

    burke142

    A PF Electron
    • Messages
      3
    • Reaction score
      0
    • Points
      11
  • 1

    sgphysics

    A PF Molecule
    • Messages
      20
    • Reaction score
      1
    • Points
      63
  • 1

    Sting33

    A PF Atom
    • Messages
      16
    • Reaction score
      0
    • Points
      31
  • 1

    fluidistic

    A PF Mountain
    • Messages
      3,923
    • Reaction score
      261
    • Points
      202
  • 1

    Crowxe

    A PF Atom
    • Messages
      45
    • Reaction score
      1
    • Points
      31
  • 1

    Cato

    A PF Cell
    • Messages
      56
    • Reaction score
      10
    • Points
      103
  • 1

    abrogard

    A PF Molecule
    • Messages
      99
    • Reaction score
      3
    • Points
      88
  • Back
    Top