A good fairy draws from the lottery wheel two successive balls

In summary: Wondering)In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a lottery wheel containing red, blue, and yellow balls labeled with numbers. A good fairy draws two successive balls from the wheel without replacing any previously drawn ones. The conversation touches on the use of the hypergeometric distribution and modeling the experiment as a discrete probability space. The probability of picking a specific labeled ball and the probability of picking two balls with a specific label-sum are also discussed.
  • #1
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
5,049
7
Hey! :eek:

I am looking at the following and need some hints:

A lottery wheel contains five red, blue and yellow balls. For each color the balls are labeled with the numbers $ 1,2,3,4 $ and $ 5 $. A good fairy draws from the lottery wheel two successive balls. A ball which has already been drawn is not moved into the drum.

Do we consider here the hypergeometri distribution?

How can we model this experiment as a discrete probability space?

How could we calculate the probability that the ball that has been picked is labeled by $2$ ?

Also how could we calculate the probability that two balls with the label-sum $4$ are picked?

(Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mathmari said:
Hey! :eek:

I am looking at the following and need some hints:

A lottery wheel contains five red, blue and yellow balls. For each color the balls are labeled with the numbers $ 1,2,3,4 $ and $ 5 $. A good fairy draws from the lottery wheel two successive balls. A ball which has already been drawn is not moved into the drum.

Do we consider here the hypergeometri distribution?

Hey mathmari! (Smile)

We would use a hypergeometric distribution if we'd look at a random variable that gives e.g. the number of green balls that we draw.
Is that the case?

mathmari said:
How can we model this experiment as a discrete probability space?

A probability space is a triplet $(\Omega, \mathcal F, P)$.
What could each of those be? (Wondering)

mathmari said:
How could we calculate the probability that the ball that has been picked is labeled by $2$ ?

I thought we were drawing 2 balls.
Which one is 'the' ball? :confused:

mathmari said:
Also how could we calculate the probability that two balls with the label-sum $4$ are picked?

(Wondering)

Let's get back to that later. (Nerd)
 
  • #3
I like Serena said:
We would use a hypergeometric distribution if we'd look at a random variable that gives e.g. the number of green balls that we draw.
Is that the case?

No, we are just looking for the probability that we get a ball with a specific property, right? This is not a distribution that I mentionned in my other post (binomial, hypergeometric, geometric, poisson, exponential), is it? (Wondering)
I like Serena said:
A probability space is a triplet $(\Omega, \mathcal F, P)$.
What could each of those be? (Wondering)

Do we have that $\Omega$ is the set of all balls, $\mathcal F$ is the set of all the possible combinations of two balls and $P$ the probability of each event? (Wondering)
I like Serena said:
I thought we were drawing 2 balls.
Which one is 'the' ball? :confused:

We have three balls that have the label $2$, one in each colour. So, is the probability that the first ball has the label $2$ equal to $\frac{3}{15}$ and that the second ball has not the label $2$ the probability is $\frac{12}{15}$ ? Is the probability that the first ball has not the label $2$ equal to $\frac{12}{15}$ and that the second ball has the label $2$ the probability is $\frac{3}{14}$ ?
(Wondering)
 
  • #4
mathmari said:
No, we are just looking for the probability that we get a ball with a specific property, right? This is not a distribution that I mentionned in my other post (binomial, hypergeometric, geometric, poisson, exponential), is it? (Wondering)

I think we're looking at a tuple of 2 balls, each with specific properties, aren't we?
And indeed, that's yet another distribution.
Which one could it be?
What can we say if we compare the chances on specific tuples?

mathmari said:
Do we have that $\Omega$ is the set of all balls, $\mathcal F$ is the set of all the possible combinations of two balls and $P$ the probability of each event? (Wondering)

A possible outcome would be that we first draw the green 2, and then draw the red 5.
So that should be in the sample space shouldn't it?
A possible event is that we draw 2 balls that have a label-sum of 4, which would be a set of tuples that satisfy the condition.

mathmari said:
We have three balls that have the label $2$, one in each colour. So, is the probability that the first ball has the label $2$ equal to $\frac{3}{15}$ and that the second ball has not the label $2$ the probability is $\frac{12}{15}$ ? Is the probability that the first ball has not the label $2$ equal to $\frac{12}{15}$ and that the second ball has the label $2$ the probability is $\frac{3}{14}$ ?
(Wondering)

All correct, except that after we have drawn the first ball, there are 14 balls left.
So the probability that the first ball has the label $2$ is indeed equal to $\frac{3}{15}$, but that the second ball has not the label $2$ has probability $\frac{12}{14}$.

But it's still not clear to me what it means that 'the' ball is a 2.
Is it intended that at least one of the two balls is a 2? (Wondering)
 
  • #5
I like Serena said:
I think we're looking at a tuple of 2 balls, each with specific properties, aren't we?
And indeed, that's yet another distribution.
Which one could it be?
What can we say if we compare the chances on specific tuples?

I don't really know what it could be. (Wondering)
I like Serena said:
All correct, except that after we have drawn the first ball, there are 14 balls left.
So the probability that the first ball has the label $2$ is indeed equal to $\frac{3}{15}$, but that the second ball has not the label $2$ has probability $\frac{12}{14}$.

Oh yes (Blush)
I like Serena said:
But it's still not clear to me what it means that 'the' ball is a 2.
Is it intended that at least one of the two balls is a 2? (Wondering)

Oh sorry! It should be "the probability that one of the picked ball is labeled by $2$". (Tmi)

So is this the sum of the probability that the first one is labeled by $2$ and the probability that the second one is labeled by $2$ ? (Wondering)
 
  • #6
mathmari said:
I don't really know what it could be. (Wondering)

What is the chance that we draw (red 2, blue 5)?
And what is the chance that we draw (green 1, blue 3)?

mathmari said:
Oh sorry! It should be "the probability that one of the picked ball is labeled by $2$". (Tmi)

So is this the sum of the probability that the first one is labeled by $2$ and the probability that the second one is labeled by $2$ ? (Wondering)

That would only be true if those events were mutually exclusive.
But they are not. It's possible for both balls to be labeled 2.
It means that we have to apply the general sum rule.

For reference, the sum rule for mutually exclusive events A and B is: $P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)$.
And the general sum rule for any events A and B is: $P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)$.
 
  • #7
I like Serena said:
What is the chance that we draw (red 2, blue 5)?
And what is the chance that we draw (green 1, blue 3)?

Do we use here the binomial coefficient? (Wondering)
I like Serena said:
That would only be true if those events were mutually exclusive.
But they are not. It's possible for both balls to be labeled 2.
It means that we have to apply the general sum rule.

For reference, the sum rule for mutually exclusive events A and B is: $P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)$.
And the general sum rule for any events A and B is: $P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)$.

Ah ok!

So we have that $$P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{12}{14}+\frac{12}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}-\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{2}{14}$$ right? (Wondering)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
mathmari said:
Also how could we calculate the probability that two balls with the label-sum $4$ are picked?

Do we have to calculate the probability $$P((\text{ Ball with label } 1) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 3))+P((\text{ Ball with label } 3) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 1))+P((\text{ Ball with label } 2) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 2))$$ ? (Wondering)

We have that $P((\text{ Ball with label } 1) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 3))=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}$, $P((\text{ Ball with label } 3) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 1))=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}$ and $P((\text{ Ball with label } 2) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 2))=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{2}{14}$, or not?

Therefore we get $$P(\text{ two balls with the label-sum } 4 \text{ are picked })=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}+\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}+\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{2}{14}$$

Is that correct? (Wondering)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
mathmari said:
Do we use here the binomial coefficient? (Wondering)

No. The chance that the first ball is red and labeled 2 is $\frac 1{15}$.
The chance that the second ball is blue and labeled 5 is $\frac 1{14}$, since there are 14 balls left.
So:
$$P(\text{red 2, blue 5}) = \frac 1{15}\cdot\frac 1{14}$$
In the same way, we have:
$$P(\text{green 1, blue 3}) = P(\text{red 2, blue 5}) = \frac 1{15}\cdot\frac 1{14}$$
In other words, the probability on any outcome, consisting of 2 different balls drawn, is the same.

Do we know of a distribution where all probabilities are the same? (Wondering)

(Btw, the notation (x,y) is also known as a tuple or a 2-tuple or an ordered pair.)

mathmari said:
Ah ok!

So we have that $$P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{12}{14}+\frac{12}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}-\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{2}{14}$$ right? (Wondering)

Yep. (Nod)

mathmari said:
Do we have to calculate the probability $$P((\text{ Ball with label } 1) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 3))+P((\text{ Ball with label } 3) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 1))+P((\text{ Ball with label } 2) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 2))$$ ? (Wondering)

We have that $P((\text{ Ball with label } 1) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 3))=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}$, $P((\text{ Ball with label } 3) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 1))=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}$ and $P((\text{ Ball with label } 2) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 2))=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{2}{14}$, or not?

Therefore we get $$P(\text{ two balls with the label-sum } 4 \text{ are picked })=\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}+\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{3}{14}+\frac{3}{15}\cdot \frac{2}{14}$$

Is that correct? (Wondering)

Not quite.

Note that $P((\text{ Ball with label } 2) \cup (\text{ Ball with label } 2))$ is the probability that at least one ball is labeled 2 AND at least one ball is labeled 2.
That is, we include the possibility that the first ball is 2 while the second ball is NOT 2.
That can't be right can it? (Worried)

Instead we should find the probability:
$$P(\text{first ball is labeled $x$} \land \text{second ball is labeled $y$} \land x+y=4)
=P((1,3) \cup (3,1) \cup (2,2))
$$
where $(x,y)$ denotes the set of outcomes with the first ball labeled $x$ and the second ball labeled $y$.
(Thinking)
 

What is a lottery wheel?

A lottery wheel is a mechanical device used to randomly select numbers or items in a game of chance, such as a lottery. It typically consists of a rotating wheel with numbered compartments or balls that are used to determine the winner.

How does a good fairy draw from the lottery wheel?

A good fairy is a fictional character often associated with granting wishes or bringing good luck. In this scenario, the fairy would likely spin the lottery wheel and randomly select two balls from the compartments, without any influence or manipulation.

What are the chances of winning when a good fairy draws two successive balls from the lottery wheel?

The chances of winning in a lottery game with a good fairy drawing two successive balls from the lottery wheel depends on the number of balls in the wheel and the number of balls required to win. The more balls there are in the wheel, the lower the chances of winning.

Is it fair for a good fairy to draw from the lottery wheel?

The fairness of a good fairy drawing from a lottery wheel depends on the rules and regulations of the game. As long as the drawing is done without any bias or manipulation, it can be considered fair. However, some may argue that the use of a good fairy introduces an element of chance or luck, which may not be desirable in a game of pure probability.

Can a good fairy improve the chances of winning in the lottery?

No, a good fairy cannot improve the chances of winning in the lottery. As a fictional character, the fairy has no control over the outcome of the game and any claims of increasing the chances of winning are purely based on superstition or belief.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
14
Views
937
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
34
Views
12K
Back
Top