I AI Discovers Alternate Physics - What Do You Think?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Joseph M. Zias
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ai Physics
AI Thread Summary
An AI analyzed a classic double pendulum experiment and proposed using 4.7 variables to describe its motion, raising questions about the interpretation of these variables. The discussion suggests that the AI's approach might indicate alternative methods of analyzing physical phenomena, potentially hinting at different frameworks of physics. Some participants speculate that this could parallel the idea of a galactic civilization having its own "new physics." The mention of chaos theory and fractals introduces the concept of non-integer dimensions as a possible explanation for the 4.7 variables. Overall, the conversation explores the implications of AI in redefining our understanding of physical laws.
Joseph M. Zias
Messages
80
Reaction score
28
TL;DR Summary
Recent article describes using AI to view classic pendulum experiment. Finds different variable to analyze the event.
There is a recent article, see below, where an AI equipped computer viewed a classic physics experiment with a double pendulum. The AI algorithm determined some different variables to describe the motion. One problem with this is the AI suggested 4.7 variables - that I don't understand - but nevertheless it is plausible that the analysis of physical events might be done differently. It was suggested that another galactic civilization might have a "new physics" as-it-were. What do you folks think of this?

https://www.sciencealert.com/ai-has...News&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=AppleNews
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like a fun experiment. It is possible that the AI considers position, velocity, acceleration
, and jerk as four independent variables.
 
Joseph M. Zias said:
Summary: Recent article describes using AI to view classic pendulum experiment. Finds different variable to analyze the event.

One problem with this is the AI suggested 4.7 variables - that I don't understand - but nevertheless ...
I haven't read the paper (paywall: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-022-00281-6) and I'm not sure if it explains 4.7 at all, but my first thought was:

A double pendulum is chaos theory. Chaos theory uses fractals. Fractals have non-integer dimensions. A dimension can be interpreted as a degree of freedom, hence a free variable. Such an interpretation could have led to the catch phrase: 4.7 dimensions.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and berkeman
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top