Analyzing Data for Correlation for Academic Research

In summary, the conversation discusses how to extrapolate a correlation from a set of data obtained from an experiment on gyroscopes. The data includes angular velocity of precession, rotational velocity, and tension force, which can be used to calculate torque. The individual is seeking guidance on how to prove or disprove their theoretical correlation in a professional and academically sophisticated way, and how to evaluate the methods and results. The conversation also touches on using error bars and regression analysis to analyze the data and find the important parameters. Suggestions are given to look up the "chi square test" and "null hypothesis" and to use least squares regression to determine the slope of the line and find the desired parameter. The individual is advised to research these topics online
  • #1
24forChromium
155
7
I hope this is the right place to post this, please move if you think it's needed.

I want to ask how do I extrapolate a correlation from a bunch of numbers. I did and experiment on gyroscopes, and have three kinds of data, w1, w3 and F_t, the later two can be used to calculate L3 and T_g. My theory is: T_g = L3 * w1.

Now, how do I prove or disprove this theoretical correlation with these data? I know that I can plot the theoretical values and the actual values on the same graph and say "look, they look like they are matching.", but how can I do this in a academically sophisticated way? Where can I learn to do this professionally? How should I evaluate the methods and the results?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I want to ask how do I extrapolate a correlation from a bunch of numbers.
Depends on the numbers and what sort of correlation you are trying to demonstrate (or, more usually, disprove).

I did and experiment on gyroscopes, and have three kinds of data, w1, w3 and F_t, the later two can be used to calculate L3 and T_g. My theory is: T_g = L3 * w1.
All this is meaningless unless you say what the symbols mean. It would also help to explain the experiment.

Now, how do I prove or disprove this theoretical correlation with these data? I know that I can plot the theoretical values and the actual values on the same graph and say "look, they look like they are matching.", but how can I do this in a academically sophisticated way? Where can I learn to do this professionally? How should I evaluate the methods and the results?
With each data point, you should have an estimate of the uncertainty in the measurement (or propagated uncertainties due to underlying measurement uncertainties). Your graph should use error bars - when the theoretical curve goes through all error bars you can say that there is a good match between theory and data ... however, it is better to use some form of regression analysis (i.e. least squares) to work out the important parameters and see if they agree (within stated error limits) with the theoretical value for the same parameter.
 
  • #3
Simon Bridge said:
All this is meaningless unless you say what the symbols mean. It would also help to explain the experiment.

Well I didn't think anyone would be interested. Since you asked, it's an experiment on how does the combination of angular momentum and velocity of precession affect the torque generated by a gyroscope. w1 is the angular velocity of precession. w3 is the gyroscope's rotational velocity (used to find its angular momentum L3) F_t is the tension force detected in a string. This string is used to pull the gyroscope up in a horizontal position, but its "task" will be alleviated if the gyroscope creates a torque to help "share its labour". Therefore, this tension force was used to find the torque generated by the gyroscope, which is T_g.

If you want to know the specifics of the experimental construction, just let me know.

Simon Bridge said:
With each data point, you should have an estimate of the uncertainty in the measurement (or propagated uncertainties due to underlying measurement uncertainties). Your graph should use error bars - when the theoretical curve goes through all error bars you can say that there is a good match between theory and data ... however, it is better to use some form of regression analysis (i.e. least squares) to work out the important parameters and see if they agree (within stated error limits) with the theoretical value for the same parameter.

Are there websites or online classes that I can access to learn about these? I am expected to write a long analysis for the experiment, just plotting the data and using mathematics may not be enough, although some regression analysis certainty would come handy.
 
  • #4
24forChromium said:
I want to ask how do I extrapolate a correlation from a bunch of numbers. I did and experiment on gyroscopes, and have three kinds of data, w1, w3 and F_t, the later two can be used to calculate L3 and T_g. My theory is: T_g = L3 * w1.
Look up "chi square test" and "null hypothesis".
 
  • #5
Tg and w1 are things you measure... the theory is that a plot of Tg vs w1 will be a straight line that passes through the origin... so you need to test the data for "goodness of fit" to a line.
The slope of the line tells you L3... which is what you wanted to calculate.
Work out the slope by least squares regression.
...

Find out about these things by googling the key words.
 

Related to Analyzing Data for Correlation for Academic Research

1. What is correlation and why is it important in academic research?

Correlation is a statistical measure that shows the relationship between two or more variables. In academic research, correlation is important because it helps researchers understand the degree and direction of relationship between variables, which can then inform further analysis and conclusions.

2. How do you determine the strength of correlation in data?

The strength of correlation can be determined by calculating the correlation coefficient, which is a numerical value between -1 and 1. A correlation coefficient closer to 1 or -1 indicates a stronger correlation, while a value closer to 0 indicates a weaker or non-existent correlation.

3. What are some common methods for analyzing data for correlation?

Some common methods for analyzing data for correlation include scatter plots, correlation matrices, and regression analysis. These methods allow researchers to visually and numerically assess the relationship between variables and determine the strength of correlation.

4. How can outliers affect the analysis of correlation?

Outliers are data points that fall significantly outside the range of other data points. In correlation analysis, outliers can skew the results and make the correlation appear stronger or weaker than it actually is. It is important to identify and properly handle outliers when analyzing data for correlation.

5. Can correlation imply causation?

No, correlation does not imply causation. Just because two variables have a strong correlation does not mean that one variable causes the other. There could be other factors or variables at play that may be responsible for the observed correlation. Further research and analysis is needed to establish a causal relationship between variables.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
972
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
5
Views
713
  • Chemistry
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top