Are Energy Eigenstate Coefficients Real-valued?

In summary: But, if you separate the ##a## from the ##\phi_n(x)##, you end up with a real-valued function and a real-valued eigenstate:$$\psi_1(x) = e^{is}\phi_n(x)$$Which is just what you wanted. So, the energy eigenstates are almost always real-valued.
  • #1
LarryS
Gold Member
345
33
TL;DR Summary
Energy Eigenstates Coefficients Real-valued?
Given any system with discreet energy eigenstates, φn(x)e-iEnt . The φn are functions only of position. But are they also almost always real-valued?Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
referframe said:
Summary:: Energy Eigenstates Coefficients Real-valued?

Given any system with discreet energy eigenstates, φn(x)e-iEnt . The φn are functions only of position. But are they also almost always real-valued?Thanks in advance.
I am assuming, given your question, by coefficients you mean the solutions to the TISE (which I would call the eigenfunctions, not coefficients). If that is the case, if you are talking about a one dimensional bound state where ##\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty}\phi_n(x)=0## (which is almost always the case for bound states), they can always be found to be real. I'll be more specific though, and give you a sketch of the proof:

First, it must be noted that if ##\phi_n(x)## solves the TISE with energy ##E_n##, then ##\tilde{\phi}_n(x)=e^{is}\phi_n(x)## (where s is a real constant) also solves the TISE with the same energy. However, ant time you take any expectation value or calculate any probability, the constant phase (i.e. the ##e^{is}##) makes no difference. Therefore, they represent the same physical state. So the energy eigenstate CAN be imaginary, but as you will see we can always chose it to be real while keeping full generality.

Next part is this: you can prove that for bound states in one dimension where ##\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty}\phi_n(x)=0##, any two solutions of the TISE are physically the same solution (that is, if two functions ##\phi_n(x)## and ##\Phi_n(x)## both solve the TISE with the same energy ##E_n##, then it is necessarily true that ##\Phi_n(x)=e^{is}\phi_n(x)## where s is a real constant). This is why we always stop at one solution for each energy-- there can never be two physically different bound state solutions in one dimension (assuming ##\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty}\phi_n(x)=0##).

Finally, the last thing to prove is this: if ##\phi_n(x)## solves the TISE with an energy ##E_n##, then the function ##\phi_{R,n}(x)=\frac{\phi_n(x)+\phi_n^*(x)}{2}## (which is real, as for any complex number or function z, ##\frac{z+z^*}{2}## is the real part of z, where the star represents the complex conjugate) also solves the TISE with energy ##E_n##. But, if we are in a one dimensional bound state where ##\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty}\phi_n(x)=0##, since both solve the TISE with the same energy, they are physically the same solution (i.e. any non-real solution is just the real solution ##\phi_{R,n}(x)## multiplied by ##e^{is}##). Therefore, we can pick whichever one we want to use, since they mean the same thing. We like to pick the real solutions for obvious reasons.

TL,DR: if we are in one dimension, in a bound state with the condition ##\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty}\phi_n(x)=0##, then we can restrict ourselves to real ##\phi_n(x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and vanhees71
  • #3
referframe said:
Summary:: Energy Eigenstates Coefficients Real-valued?

Given any system with discreet energy eigenstates, φn(x)e-iEnt . The φn are functions only of position. But are they also almost always real-valued?Thanks in advance.
The energy eigenstates can be taken to be real-valued functions. There is a simple proof of this. Basically, all you do is move any complex factors the the coefficients. You could, for example, have a system in the initial state:
$$\psi_0(x) = a \phi_n(x)$$
Where ##a## is any complex number with unit modulus. Of course, you could equally take this function, with the ##a## included, to be your basis eigenstate.
 

1. What are energy eigenstate coefficients?

Energy eigenstate coefficients are the numerical values that represent the relative strengths of different energy states in a quantum system. They are used in the mathematical description of quantum mechanics to calculate the probability of a particle being in a specific energy state.

2. Are energy eigenstate coefficients real-valued?

Yes, energy eigenstate coefficients are always real-valued. This means that they can be represented by a single number on the real number line, without any imaginary component. This is because energy states in a quantum system are always observed to have real values, and the coefficients represent the relative strengths of these states.

3. How are energy eigenstate coefficients determined?

Energy eigenstate coefficients are determined through mathematical calculations using the Schrödinger equation, which describes the time evolution of a quantum system. The coefficients are found by solving the equation for the energy states of the system, and the resulting values represent the relative strengths of these states.

4. What is the significance of real-valued energy eigenstate coefficients?

The real-valued nature of energy eigenstate coefficients is significant because it reflects the observable reality of energy states in a quantum system. This means that the coefficients can be used to accurately predict the probability of a particle being in a specific energy state, which is essential for understanding and manipulating quantum systems.

5. Can energy eigenstate coefficients be complex numbers?

No, energy eigenstate coefficients cannot be complex numbers. This is because energy states in a quantum system are always observed to have real values, and the coefficients represent the relative strengths of these states. However, in some cases, the coefficients may have an imaginary component due to mathematical conventions, but this does not affect their overall real-valued nature.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
651
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
831
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
924
Back
Top