- #1
kolleamm
- 477
- 44
Is there any average time between responses in a simple conversation using speech (not text)?
For example
Bob : Hello
1sec gap
Mike : Hey!
For example
Bob : Hello
1sec gap
Mike : Hey!
I think there are too many factors, making up quite a spread in response times, for an "average" to be meaningful.kolleamm said:Is there any average time between responses in a simple conversation using speech (not text)?
For example
Bob : Hello
1sec gap
Mike : Hey!
There is also the fact that some people are just naturally slower in conversation. And some topics require much more thought than others, and on and on.kuruman said:I have noticed that when people have scripted conversations on television shows, the average time of responses is shorter than in an unscripted conversation and complex questions are answered immediately. The delay time needed to formulate an answer in one's head is a variable that depends on a lot of parameters as @phinds noted. It may be longer if one is not a native speaker of the language, if one tries to cover up the truth or remember the lies he/she has already told, if one needs time to think how to spare someone else's feelings, etc. etc.
I find this topic very interesting, because I always find it difficult to judge when it is safe to say something without interrupting - ie has the pause been long enough that the other has finished speaking? I even wrote an essay about it, expressing my perplexity.kolleamm said:Is there any average time between responses in a simple conversation using speech (not text)?
For example
Bob : Hello
1sec gap
Mike : Hey!
I would like my game characters to give more realistic response times.phinds said:There is also the fact that some people are just naturally slower in conversation. And some topics require much more thought than others, and on and on.
By the way, @kolleamm, why do you care? What would you do with the information even if it existed?
An important factor being, I think, whether it is face-face or remote.phinds said:I think there are too many factors, making up quite a spread in response times, for an "average" to be meaningful.
The average response time in a conversation can vary depending on different factors such as the complexity of the topic, the number of people involved, and the level of comfort between the participants. However, on average, a response time of 3-5 seconds is considered normal in a casual conversation.
Response time can greatly impact communication as it can affect the flow and rhythm of the conversation. A fast response time can indicate active listening and engagement, while a slow response time may cause the conversation to feel awkward or uncoordinated. Additionally, a delayed response may also lead to misunderstandings or missed opportunities to contribute to the conversation.
Yes, response time can be improved through practice and being conscious of one's own communication habits. Active listening, focusing on the speaker, and avoiding distractions can help decrease response time. Additionally, being knowledgeable about the topic being discussed can also help reduce response time as one can quickly formulate a response.
Technology can affect response time in conversations in both positive and negative ways. On one hand, technology allows for quick communication through messaging platforms, which can lead to faster response times. However, it can also cause delays in face-to-face conversations as people may become distracted by their devices. In virtual conversations, technology can also cause delays due to technical difficulties or lag time.
Yes, there can be differences in response time between different forms of communication. For example, in face-to-face conversations, response time may be quicker as people can read nonverbal cues and have immediate back-and-forth communication. In written communication, such as emails or text messages, response time may be slower as there is a time delay between sending and receiving messages. Additionally, in virtual conversations, response time may also be slower due to potential technical issues or the absence of nonverbal cues.