Bell scenarios with communication

In summary, the conversation and research discussed in this article focuses on the concept of quantum nonlocality, which refers to the different predictions made by classical and quantum physics in experiments with separate observers who do not communicate. The article explores how allowing different forms of communication between parties can affect the nature of quantum correlations and potentially lead to new applications with increased security. The researchers also examine the amount of communication needed to reproduce quantum or no-signalling correlations using classical models, as well as how classical communication can be incorporated into quantum models to achieve no-signalling correlations.
  • #1
DrClaude
Mentor
8,386
5,475
Bell scenarios with communication
J B Brask and R Chaves

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Volume 50, Number 9 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08182)

Abstract
Classical and quantum physics provide fundamentally different predictions about experiments with separate observers that do not communicate, a phenomenon known as quantum nonlocality. This insight is a key element of our present understanding of quantum physics, and also enables a number of information processing protocols with security beyond what is classically attainable. Relaxing the pivotal assumption of no communication leads to new insights into the nature quantum correlations, and may enable new applications where security can be established under less strict assumptions. Here, we study such relaxations where different forms of communication are allowed. We consider communication of inputs, outputs, and of a message between the parties. Using several measures, we study how much communication is required for classical models to reproduce quantum or general no-signalling correlations, as well as how quantum models can be augmented with classical communication to reproduce no-signalling correlations.
 
  • Like
Likes Strilanc and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org

1. What is a Bell scenario with communication?

A Bell scenario with communication is a type of experiment in quantum mechanics that involves two or more distant observers exchanging information in order to test the principles of non-locality and entanglement. This type of experiment was first proposed by physicist John Stewart Bell in the 1960s.

2. How does a Bell scenario with communication work?

In a Bell scenario with communication, two distant observers, usually referred to as Alice and Bob, are given random pairs of particles that have been entangled. They then perform measurements on their respective particles and exchange information about their results. By comparing their data, they can determine if the particles exhibit non-local correlations, which would violate the principle of locality in classical physics.

3. What is the purpose of a Bell scenario with communication?

The purpose of a Bell scenario with communication is to test the predictions of quantum mechanics and determine if there is a hidden variable theory that can explain the behavior of entangled particles. If the experimental results violate the principle of locality, it would provide evidence for the non-locality and probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.

4. What are the implications of a successful Bell scenario with communication?

If a Bell scenario with communication produces results that are consistent with the predictions of quantum mechanics, it would further support the theory and demonstrate the existence of non-local correlations between entangled particles. This would also have implications for our understanding of the fundamental nature of reality and could potentially lead to advancements in technologies such as quantum computing and cryptography.

5. Are there any challenges or limitations to performing a Bell scenario with communication?

One of the main challenges of performing a Bell scenario with communication is ensuring that the observers are truly distant from each other and that there is no way for them to communicate through other means, such as hidden signals. This requires careful experimental design and control. Another limitation is that the results of such experiments may be affected by various external factors, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Additionally, the interpretation of the results can be a subject of debate among scientists and philosophers.

Similar threads

B FTL Communication: Closing Bell Test Loopholes for Quantum Integrity
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Simulation of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL
    • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
I Big Bell Test Collaboration: Challenging Local Realism with Human Choices
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Bell vs Kolmogorov: Unravelling Probability Theory Limits
    • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
93
Views
5K
I A popular explanation of Bell's inequalities
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
2K
B Classical experiment violates Bell
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Game theory, quantum physics and the Bell inequality (paper)
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
787
I How do you understand EPR & Bell's Theorem?
    • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
I Teleportation isn't exclusively quantum....?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
781

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top