Calculating Solar Mass using peak Doppler shifts

In summary, two planets have different periods but have the same maximum velocity. One planet has a mass 2E30 kg, while the other has a mass 1E30 kg.
  • #1
bbbl67
212
21

Homework Statement


Imagine two planets orbiting a star with orbits edge-on to the Earth. The peak Doppler shift for each 70 m/s, but one has a period of 7 days and the other has a period of 700 days. The star has a mass of one solar mass. (Assume 1 solar mass equals 2E+30 kg.)

Q1: Calculate the mass of the shorter period planet.

Q2: Calculate the mass of the longer period planet.

Homework Equations


(1) Kepler's 3rd law:
T^2 = (4 π^2 a^3)/(G (m_1 + m_2)) |
m_1 | primary mass
a | semi-major axis
T | orbital period
m_2 | secondary mass
G | Newtonian gravitational constant (≈ 6.674×10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2))
(orbital period and semimajor axis relation)
https://is.gd/55FdVC

(2) orbital velocity formula:
v_c = sqrt((G m)/r) |
v_c | circular velocity
m | mass of orbit center
r | orbital radius
G | Newtonian gravitational constant (≈ 6.674×10^-11 m^3/(kg s^2))
https://is.gd/ELmJxr

The Attempt at a Solution


The m of equation #2 is the same as the m_1 of equation #1. Also, the a of eq #1 is the same as the r of eq #2. So you would rearrange the smaller equation and substitute it into the larger equation. Equation #2 looks like this rearranged.

v_c = sqrt((G m)/r)
v_c^2 = (G m)/r
m = (v_c^2 r)/G
r = (G m)/v_c^2

We now substitute between the two equations.

m_1 = m
r = a
m_1 = (v_c^2 a)/G

T^2 = (4 π^2 a^3)/(G (m_1 + m_2))
= (4 π^2 a^3)/(G ((v_c^2 a)/G + m_2))
= (4 π^2 a^3)/(v_c^2 a + G m_2))
v_c^2 a + G m_2 = T^2/(4 π^2 a^3)
G m_2 = T^2/(4 π^2 a^3) - v_c^2 a
m_2 = T^2/((4 π^2 a^3) - v_c^2 a) G)

So we know the following values:
m_1 = 2E30 kg
v_c = 70 m/s
T = 7 days | 700 days

What we need to solve for are:
a = ?
m_2 = ?

So basically, I have two variables and two equations, and I can't find a single solution for that until I have a 3rd equation. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Two planets with the same maximum velocity but different periods would seem to indicate that one or both orbits are elliptical, not circular. You'll need to use a more general form of the orbit velocity equation. Unfortunately that will introduce another variable, the perihelion distance (where velocity on orbit is maximized).
 
  • #3
gneill said:
Two planets with the same maximum velocity but different periods would seem to indicate that one or both orbits are elliptical, not circular. You'll need to use a more general form of the orbit velocity equation. Unfortunately that will introduce another variable, the perihelion distance (where velocity on orbit is maximized).
Is this solvable as it is now, do you think?
 
  • #4
bbbl67 said:
Is this solvable as it is now, do you think?
I must admit that at the moment I can't think of a way to proceed.
 
  • Like
Likes bbbl67
  • #5
If there was only one planet, then the star and planet can both orbit around the center of mass ("barycenter") in circular orbits. If the Doppler shift is associated with spectral lines emitted by the star due to its orbital motion, then you can work out the mass of the planet using the concept of reduced mass, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_two-body_problem

But, I don't know how to handle two planets unless you just assume they can be treated independently.

@bbbl67, it is important to note that the orbital speed of the star equals (2π/T)⋅rs, where rs is the radius of the star's orbit. rs is related to the distance of separation, a, of the planet and star by a factor that depends on the masses of the planet and the star (see the link above). This gives you another relation to work with.
 
  • #6
I find it hard to believe there is enough information here.

The trouble is that the velocity is given by ##v_i^2=\mu_i(\frac 2{r_i}-\frac 1{a_i})##, where ##\mu_i=M+m_i##, i=1,2.
But we have no idea about ri. We do not know how the semi-major axis of each aligns with our view of the system.

There is another difficulty. If we assume both mi<<M, then clearly there is no way to find their masses, since both velocity and period only depend on M. It follows that at least one mass is comparable to M. But that makes it a three body problem in which Kepler no longer applies.
 
  • #7
TSny said:
If there was only one planet, then the star and planet can both orbit around the center of mass ("barycenter") in circular orbits. If the Doppler shift is associated with spectral lines emitted by the star due to its orbital motion, then you can work out the mass of the planet using the concept of reduced mass, etc.
Doesn't that assume a roughly circular orbit?
 
  • #8
haruspex said:
Doesn't that assume a roughly circular orbit?
Yes, I am assuming the planet and star orbit in circles about the center of mass. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Orbit2.gif

The problem statement isn't clear. I might be totally misinterpreting the problem. But, I can get an answer with this interpretation.
 

1. What is the method used to calculate solar mass using peak Doppler shifts?

The method used to calculate solar mass using peak Doppler shifts is called the Newtonian form of Kepler's third law. This method involves measuring the peak Doppler shifts of spectral lines from the solar atmosphere and using the formula M = v^2R/G, where M is the solar mass, v is the peak Doppler shift, R is the distance from the center of the Sun, and G is the gravitational constant.

2. How accurate is the calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts?

The calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts is highly accurate. Due to advancements in technology and techniques, scientists are able to measure peak Doppler shifts with high precision, resulting in a more accurate calculation of the solar mass. However, there may still be some margin of error due to factors such as instrumental limitations and uncertainties in distance measurements.

3. Can the calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts be affected by other factors?

Yes, there are other factors that can affect the calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts. For example, the presence of magnetic fields on the surface of the Sun can cause slight variations in the spectral lines, which can affect the accuracy of the measurement. Additionally, the movement of the Sun's convection cells can also cause small variations in the peak Doppler shifts.

4. How does the calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts contribute to our understanding of the Sun?

The calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts is an important tool in understanding the Sun's physical properties and behavior. By accurately determining the mass of the Sun, scientists can better understand its gravitational influence on other objects in the solar system and its role in the dynamics of the solar system as a whole. This calculation also provides valuable insights into the Sun's internal structure and composition.

5. Is the calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts a widely accepted method?

Yes, the calculation of solar mass using peak Doppler shifts is a widely accepted method among scientists. It has been used for many years and has been validated by multiple studies and observations. However, as with any scientific method, there may be ongoing research and improvements being made to further refine the accuracy of the calculation.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
453
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
923
Replies
44
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
998
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
830
Back
Top