B Can Geometric Progressions Starting from One Sum to a Perfect Square?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Medtner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a geometric progression starting from one that sums to a perfect square. An example provided is 1 + 3 + 9 + 27 + 81 = 121, which equals 11^2. Participants suggest using spreadsheets to explore more combinations, noting there are two three-digit examples. Additionally, examining the differences between consecutive squares may offer insights into potential solutions. The conversation highlights the challenge of identifying real-life examples of such geometric progressions.
Medtner
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
"Write out a series of three or more different whole numbers in geometric progression, starting from one, so that the numbers should add up to a square. So like, 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 = 63 (one short of a square)"(can't find an actual real life example)

I can't seem to find an answer for this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just use a spreadsheet to try some more, there are two three-digit examples.
 
1+3+9+27+81=121=11^2
 
Medtner said:
"Write out a series of three or more different whole numbers in geometric progression, starting from one, so that the numbers should add up to a square. So like, 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 = 63 (one short of a square)"(can't find an actual real life example)

I can't seem to find an answer for this?
Try considering the sequence of squares, 0, 1, 4, 9, ..., and take the difference between subsequent squares. That will help you find the answer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top