Can particles be entangled on any property having more than two states?

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
can particles be entangled on any property having more than two states?

Photons can be entangled on spin. however spin has only two states:

Up or down, plus or minus

So the question is:

is there any property (having more than two states) on which photons/electrons/bucky-ball can be entangled?

note: measuring the spin in different directions is still dealing with only a two-state spin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My gut feeling is yes. If you have a photon decomposing into an electron and a positron, then (in the centre of mass frame), the two particles will move apart with the same momentum. If we then measure the position of one of the particles, then we must disturb the momentum of the other - otherwise it would be possible to measure the momentum of the other particle and hence break Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, knowing both the position and momentum of at least one of the particles.

Since the momentum and position has an infinite number of states (infinite is greater than 2), then my answer is yes. However, I'd love someone else to add their viewpoint on this.
 
Yes, as mentioned position and momentum are examples of observables with more than 2 states. There can be entanglement on those.
 
Sure, you can even have entanglement on continuous variables, although it is non-trivial to create such a state. Check for example the paper on three-photon energy-time entanglement in the upcoming issue of Nature Physics where the Jennewein group managed to create tripartite continuous-variable entanglement between three separated particles (Shalm et al., Nature Physics (2012) doi:10.1038/nphys2492).
 
DeShark said:
Since the momentum and position has an infinite number of states (infinite is greater than 2), then my answer is yes. However, I'd love someone else to add their viewpoint on this.

Thanks DeShark, DrChinese and Cthuga.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top