Circular motion experiment using accelerometer and gyroscope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on an experiment to estimate the length of a rigid body using an accelerometer and gyroscope while moving in a circular motion. The relationship between tangential velocity (v), angular velocity (ω), and the radius (R) is established, but there is confusion regarding the calculation of tangential velocity from the accelerometer output. The challenge lies in separating gravitational effects from linear acceleration when the accelerometer's orientation changes. Participants express difficulty in understanding the experimental setup based on the provided description. The thread emphasizes the complexities of accurately determining tangential velocity using accelerometer data in varying orientations.
epyd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Currently, I'm doing an experiment to estimate length of a rigid body.
The approach is based on information from accelerometer and gyroscope while the rigid body is moved in circular way.

The relationship is: v = ω x R (all are vectors, and 'x' means cross products)

v = tangential velocity
ω = angular velocity (gyroscope output)
R = vector of the rigid body

However, I am confused about the 'v' (tangential velocity). I was trying to calculate it by integrating accelerometer output. But, as we know, in accelerometer's output we have to information, gravity and linear acceleration.

It is easy to remove the gravity from accelerometer output, if the orientation of accelerometer does not change. But, how can we remove the gravity when the orientation of accelerometer changes over the time ?

Is it possible to calculate tangential velocity using accelerometer?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, but it's very difficult to understand your experimental setup with the description you gave.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top