Collapse and creation of wave function

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
in a double slit experiment, if we find which-way and then stop observing the photon and send it again through another double slit (kept in, say, series), would an interference pattern occur?...the second time around
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I am envisioning your thought experiment correctly, then yes.

Just to make sure I'm visualizing the same thing, you're talking about letting the photon pass through a detection screen, then through a second double slit, then to a second detector, you should be able to get a second interference pattern, in theory, as long as the experiment is set up correctly.
 
CJames said:
If I am envisioning your thought experiment correctly, then yes.

Just to make sure I'm visualizing the same thing, you're talking about letting the photon pass through a detection screen, then through a second double slit, then to a second detector, you should be able to get a second interference pattern, in theory, as long as the experiment is set up correctly.

thanks CJames. so in the first screen there would be no interference pattern (because we got which-way) however the second screen would have the interference pattern.

so getting which-way causes the photon to behave as a particle but only for a short period of time, when we are observing the photon?
 
San K said:
thanks CJames. so in the first screen there would be no interference pattern (because we got which-way) however the second screen would have the interference pattern.

so getting which-way causes the photon to behave as a particle but only for a short period of time, when we are observing the photon?

When we have determined the path of a said photon then we observe that it behave particle like i.e for example if one photon has gone through a slit we'll see a point on the screen ahead however say if haven't observed the wave-function of the photon then an interference pattern is observed. Yes,for a short period as long as the observer is inciting a collapse.

Have a read on Schrodinger's "Cat in a box" experiment[ C.I] which explains quantum behavior adequately and HUP.When we know the position of a particle with greater precision then this induces greater uncertainty over the momentum parameter, as a result of this we find ourselves being able to calculate one parameter but this irrevocable changes other.

-ibysaiyan
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top