Compatibility of Determinism & CTC in General Relativity

In summary: So determinism does not impose any requirement on what happens in the parallel transport test.In summary, GR makes use of the Riemann tensor itself using parallel transport along a closed curve to test for curvature. This is not the same as a closed timelike curve, which is a feature of certain spacetimes. Determinism, as applied to GR, says that the entire 4-d spacetime geometry and the worldline of any object in the spacetime are determined by appropriate initial data. However, determinism does not impose any requirement on what happens in the parallel transport test, as it is not a worldline of any particle and the values being compared are not the same physical observable.
  • #1
jk22
729
24
GR makes use of the Riemann tensor itself using parellel transport along a closed curve.

Now GR says the 4th dimension were time, hence the vector comes to the same time and place it begun on the loop.

Now if determinism is admitted then at every time every quantity is defined uniquely at every place.

So if this determinism is admitted the end and start vector should be the same and hence there should be no curvature ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The thread title references CTCs, which are closed timelike curves, but that is not what your question is about. The closed curve around which we parallel transport a vector to see if it changes (a change shows a nonzero Riemann curvature tensor) is not the same thing as a closed timelike curve in particular spacetimes that have them (like the Godel universe). You can do the parallel transport test for curvature in any spacetime, whether it has CTCs or not.
 
  • #3
jk22 said:
if this determinism is admitted the end and start vector should be the same

No. That is not what determinism says.

Determinism, as applied to GR, says that the entire 4-d spacetime geometry is determined by an appropriate set of initial data. (Note that there are quite a few technicalities here, some of which involve CTCs; but, as I noted in my previous post, your question actually has nothing to do with CTCs.) It also says that the worldline of any object in the spacetime is determined by an appropriate set of initial conditions. But the closed curve around which you do the parallel transport of a vector to test for curvature is not the worldline of any particle (although individual portions of it may be the worldlines of different particles). So determinism does not impose any requirement on what happens to the vector in the parallel transport test.
 
  • #4
jk22 said:
if determinism is admitted then at every time every quantity is defined uniquely at every place

No, that is not what determinism says. Determinism says that every physical observable is uniquely defined at every event. But the two different values of the vector before and after being parallel transported around the loop in the parallel transport test are not two different values of the same physical observable. (They could be values of different physical observables.)
 

1. What is determinism in general relativity?

Determinism in general relativity refers to the idea that the future state of the universe is completely determined by its present state and the laws of physics. This means that if we know the precise positions and velocities of all particles in the universe at a given time, we can accurately predict their positions and velocities at any future time.

2. What are CTCs in general relativity?

CTCs (closed timelike curves) are paths in spacetime that loop back on themselves, allowing an object or particle to return to its own past. They are a theoretical consequence of certain solutions to Einstein's equations of general relativity, such as the famous "time machine" solution known as the Tipler cylinder.

3. How do CTCs and determinism relate to each other in general relativity?

The presence of CTCs in a solution of general relativity can potentially violate determinism, as an object or particle traveling along a CTC could potentially change its own past and create a paradox. This is known as the "grandfather paradox" or "bootstrap paradox". However, there are different interpretations and debates among physicists about the implications of CTCs for determinism.

4. Can determinism and CTCs coexist in general relativity?

Some physicists argue that determinism and CTCs can coexist in general relativity, as long as the laws of physics are consistent and self-consistent. This means that if an object or particle travels along a CTC and changes its own past, the resulting future must still be consistent with the laws of physics and the initial conditions. However, others argue that the presence of CTCs inherently undermines determinism in general relativity.

5. What are some potential implications of the compatibility or incompatibility of determinism and CTCs in general relativity?

If determinism and CTCs are compatible in general relativity, it could have significant implications for our understanding of causality and the nature of time. It could also have implications for the possibility of time travel and the existence of parallel universes. On the other hand, if they are fundamentally incompatible, it could challenge our understanding of the laws of physics and the predictability of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
871
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
63
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
917
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top