Conservation of heat on a closed system

In summary, the problem involves mixing 75 kg of water at 45 degrees celsius with 70 kg of aluminum at 2600 degrees celsius. Using the given specific heat capacities and latent heats, the final state of the system and the amount of liquid water left was calculated. However, the initial temperature of the water was not taken into account, leading to incorrect results. The correct approach would be to calculate the amount of heat transferred from the aluminum to the water at each step of the process, taking into consideration the phases of both substances.
  • #1
Ethan_Tab
57
2

Homework Statement


Hey folks, anyone who can help me with this one get a massive shoutout. Here goes: 75 kg of water at 45 degrees celsius is "mixed" with 70 kg of Aluminum at 2600 Degrees Celsius. What is the final state of both system and how much, If any, of liquid water will be left

Assume the following conditions.
Specific heat capacity :
Water--4.18X10^3
Aluminium-- 9.2X10^2

Latent Heat of fusion
Aluminium-- 6.6X10^5

Latent Heat of Vaporization
Water--2.3X10^6

Boiling points
Water-100

Melting points
Alumium--2519

Homework Equations


Q=mc(delta temperture)
L_fusion or vaporavation=mL_f or mL_v

I will represent the following as these variables
Ti= temperture intial
F=Final temperature of system
w=Water
a=alumium

The Attempt at a Solution


m_w*c_w(100-Ti_w)+m_w*Lv_w+m_w*c_w(F-100)+m_a*c_a(2519-Ti_a)+m_a*Lf_a+m_a*c_a(F-2519)=0

Factoring out the F out of the two terms and isolating for it I get:

F= [-m_w*c_w(55)-m_w*Lv_w+m_w*c_w(100)+m_a*c_a(81)-m_a*Lf_a+m_a*c_a(2519)]/(m_w*c_w+m_a*c_a)
This results in a negative number. Any Ideas where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We don't encourage "unit-free" calculations here at PF.

You should show ALL units for your data and in your calculations.

It avoids a lot of confusion and unnecessary back and forth between the OP and anyone wishing to help.

You should also post your actual calculation results so it makes it easier to determine where your analysis went wrong.
 
  • #3
With such questions you need to recognise that there are several possible final states: at one extreme, all the water vaporises and none of the aluminum soldifies; at the other, all the aluminium sets and no water vaporises. If you construct an equation according to the wrong final state you will get silly answers. (I haven't checked your arithmetic, so there are other possible explanations.)
One approach is to go for a middling possibility, and if the answer is physically impossible it will show you which way to step. Another is to proceed in stages, first letting the aluminium cool and the water warm until one of them reaches its phase transition, etc.
 
  • #4
haruspex said:
With such questions you need to recognise that there are several possible final states: at one extreme, all the water vaporises and none of the aluminum soldifies; at the other, all the aluminium sets and no water vaporises. If you construct an equation according to the wrong final state you will get silly answers. (I haven't checked your arithmetic, so there are other possible explanations.)
One approach is to go for a middling possibility, and if the answer is physically impossible it will show you which way to step. Another is to proceed in stages, first letting the aluminium cool and the water warm until one of them reaches its phase transition, etc.

I see what you are saying, using the step by step approach, and getting each of the substances to their state changes and working from there, accordingly, I got something interesting happening. It so happened that when the water was in the Latent Vaporization state, The aluminium "ran out" of heat. I calculated this occurring at 87.07% of the way through the water vaporizing stage. However, I feel like the extreme difference in temperatures makes this scenario unlikely and almost improbable. With that being said, My calculation tell me that when The 70 kg of Aluminuim cools completely to 0 Celsius, 65.303kg of the water is in the vapour state (at 100*C) and the remaining 9.697kg is in liquid state (at 100* C). Does this seem probable or even realistic?
 
  • #5
SteamKing said:
We don't encourage "unit-free" calculations here at PF.

You should show ALL units for your data and in your calculations.

It avoids a lot of confusion and unnecessary back and forth between the OP and anyone wishing to help.

You should also post your actual calculation results so it makes it easier to determine where your analysis went wrong.

Sorry about the confusion, SteamKing, Ill be sure to include units next time. However, all units above are in standard SI units.
 
  • #6
Ethan_Tab said:
I see what you are saying, using the step by step approach, and getting each of the substances to their state changes and working from there, accordingly, I got something interesting happening. It so happened that when the water was in the Latent Vaporization state, The aluminium "ran out" of heat. I calculated this occurring at 87.07% of the way through the water vaporizing stage. However, I feel like the extreme difference in temperatures makes this scenario unlikely and almost improbable. With that being said, My calculation tell me that when The 70 kg of Aluminuim cools completely to 0 Celsius, 65.303kg of the water is in the vapour state (at 100*C) and the remaining 9.697kg is in liquid state (at 100* C). Does this seem probable or even realistic?

No, this is not possible. You are not going to have a bunch of icy cold aluminum surrounded by steam. The water started off at 45 °C, so it is impossible that the aluminum will wind up colder than this.

You should work these types of problems knowing that heat flows from a hotter substance to a colder substance and stops completely when the temperatures of the substances are equalized.

Since multiple phase changes are involved (and which occur at constant temperature), what haruspex recommended is apt: calculate the amount of heat transferred from the aluminum to the water at each step of the process, paying attention to the phases of the water and the Al.
 
  • #7
SteamKing said:
No, this is not possible. You are not going to have a bunch of icy cold aluminum surrounded by steam. The water started off at 45 °C, so it is impossible that the aluminum will wind up colder than this.

You should work these types of problems knowing that heat flows from a hotter substance to a colder substance and stops completely when the temperatures of the substances are equalized.

Since multiple phase changes are involved (and which occur at constant temperature), what haruspex recommended is apt: calculate the amount of heat transferred from the aluminum to the water at each step of the process, paying attention to the phases of the water and the Al.

Ah, Yes, I see... I forgot to adjust for the initial temperature of the water. Would it then be more sensible to say that 70kg of 45*C Aluminium is surrounded by 10.957 kg of liquid water at 100*C and the remaining 64.043kg being water vapour at 100*C-- (this is after the adjustment for the 45 degrees) or would i have to go on use conservation of heat to find an equilibrium point between the 3 substances?
 
  • #8
Ethan_Tab said:
Ah, Yes, I see... I forgot to adjust for the initial temperature of the water. Would it then be more sensible to say that 70kg of 45*C Aluminium is surrounded by 10.957 kg of liquid water at 100*C and the remaining 64.043kg being water vapour at 100*C-- (this is after the adjustment for the 45 degrees) or would i have to go on use conservation of heat to find an equilibrium point between the 3 substances?
There are only two substances: water and aluminum. The problem you have is that the water may exist in two different phases simultaneously.

And, no, you are not going to have aluminum at 45 °C while the water is hotter. This is the same absurdity you had in the previous post.

The heat transfer stops when all of the aluminum and all of the water, regardless of phase, are at the same temperature.
 
  • #9
To elaborate a little on SteamKing's advice, there are three ranges of final temperature to be considered.
 

1. What is the conservation of heat on a closed system?

The conservation of heat on a closed system refers to the principle that states that the total amount of heat energy within a closed system remains constant. This means that heat energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred from one form to another.

2. Why is the conservation of heat important?

The conservation of heat is important because it helps us understand and predict the behavior of energy within a closed system. This principle is crucial in various fields such as thermodynamics, engineering, and environmental science.

3. How does the conservation of heat affect the Earth's climate?

The conservation of heat plays a crucial role in regulating the Earth's climate. The Earth is considered a closed system, and the balance between the incoming solar radiation and the outgoing heat energy is essential for maintaining a stable climate. Any disruption to this balance can lead to significant changes in global temperatures.

4. What are some examples of closed systems in everyday life?

Some examples of closed systems in everyday life include a sealed water bottle, a thermos, and a refrigerator. In each of these systems, the transfer of heat energy is limited, allowing for the conservation of heat within the system.

5. Can the conservation of heat be violated?

No, the conservation of heat is a fundamental principle of thermodynamics and cannot be violated. However, in some cases, it may appear that heat is being created or destroyed, but in reality, it is being transferred to or from the system in ways that may not be immediately visible.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top