Could the Odderon intercept be ##\alpha_\mathbb {O}(0)=0.813##?

In summary, the directed percolation dynamical universality class has three independent critical exponents, with values of 0.813(9), 0.584(5), and 1.110(10) in 3-dimensional space. These values are in agreement with the Reggeon and Pomeron intercept values used in fitting the total cross-sections of stable hadrons. In the low x limit of deep inelastic scattering, a "hard Pomeron" is needed, while the Reggeon is not relevant. In 2-dimensional space, the directed percolation universality class has critical exponent values of 0.5834(30), 0.7333(75), and 1.2950
  • #1
Anashim
40
1
The directed percolation dynamical universality class is characterized by just three independent critical exponents. These exponents are (in a 3d space):

$$\beta=\beta'=0.813(9)$$
$$\nu_\perp=0.584(5)$$
$$\nu_\parallel=1.110(10)$$

The latter two numbers are in close agreement with the (soft) Reggeon and Pomeron intercept values used to fit the total cross-sections of all known stable hadrons.

In the low ##x## limit of deep inelastic scattering, a different Pomeron seems to be needed: the "hard Pomeron", whereas the Reggeon does not play any role. The directed percolation universality class (this time in d=2), has the following independent critical exponent values:

$$\beta=\beta'=0.5834(30)$$
$$\nu_\perp=0.7333(75)$$
$$\nu_\parallel=1.2950(60)$$

Again, the latter value is very close to the accepted "hard Pomeron" intercept value. Could this mean that the number of relevant spatial dimensions has decreased from 3 to 2?

Since Pomerons are explained in QCD as 'reggeized' colorless glueballs, it could be that this universality class (The Directed Percolation) is related to the collective bahavior of 'reggeized gluons'.

This hypothesis, admittedly weak, comes, however, with a prediction. Since there is a third Regge trajectory (the Odderon) needed to explain the difference between ##pp## and ##p\bar p## total cross-sections, the (soft) Odderon intercept value should be close to the third critical exponent ##0.813(9)##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you reference some publications discussing this?
Personal speculations are outside the scope of this forum.
 

1. What is the Odderon intercept?

The Odderon intercept is a theoretical value that represents the energy at which the Odderon, a hypothetical particle in particle physics, would have zero spin. It is denoted by ##\alpha_\mathbb{O}(0)## and has been a topic of study in the field of high-energy physics.

2. What is the significance of the Odderon intercept being ##\alpha_\mathbb{O}(0)=0.813##?

If the Odderon intercept is indeed ##\alpha_\mathbb{O}(0)=0.813##, it would support the existence of the Odderon particle and provide further evidence for the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). It would also have implications for our understanding of the strong nuclear force and the behavior of particles at very high energies.

3. How is the Odderon intercept calculated?

The Odderon intercept is calculated using theoretical models and mathematical equations based on QCD. It is a complex process that involves analyzing experimental data and making predictions about the behavior of particles at high energies.

4. What is the current state of research on the Odderon intercept?

The Odderon intercept has been a subject of study for many years, but its exact value is still a topic of debate among scientists. Some experiments have suggested a value close to ##\alpha_\mathbb{O}(0)=0.813##, while others have found different values. Further research and experiments are needed to confirm the exact value of the Odderon intercept.

5. How does the Odderon intercept relate to other particles?

The Odderon intercept is related to other particles, such as the Pomeron and the Regge trajectory, which are also theoretical particles in QCD. These particles are thought to play a role in the behavior of particles at high energies and their study can help us understand the fundamental forces of nature.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
988
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top