- #1
Connor11
- 2
- 0
Hi I’m a high school senior taking physics and had this crazy idea for nuclear waste disposal.
Given:
I thought of looking toward a rail gun. I found a preliminary assessment by nasa
https://ia700501.us.archive.org/14/items/nasa_techdoc_19820021469/19820021469.pdf
but I saw a major flaw: If the gun malfunctioned nuclear waste could still be launched but fall back to Earth at an unknown location.
My addition to their plan would be to have baffles like at a gun range but in reverse. (see figure) This baffles are circular in shape but with a opening for the nuclear waste projectile. The openings are positioned to stop a projectile not within tolerances with regards to angle and speed. With the known target velocity (~ 20 km/s), angle, and acceleration due to gravity the path that the projectile would take would be calculated and any projectile not on this path would be stopped.
The key benefit to this idea is that if something were to happen during launch the nuclear waste would collide and at least be in a known location instead of somewhere in the sea. There would not have to be a search effort and the possibility of losing the projectile.
So because my knowledge is exhausted I turn to you guys to assess the feasibility of this solution from a physics perspective and the risks involved.
Also...
Connor
Given:
- Space is a good place to put nuclear waste
- Rockets can malfunction possibly leading to their nuclear waste payload being being dispersed
I thought of looking toward a rail gun. I found a preliminary assessment by nasa
https://ia700501.us.archive.org/14/items/nasa_techdoc_19820021469/19820021469.pdf
but I saw a major flaw: If the gun malfunctioned nuclear waste could still be launched but fall back to Earth at an unknown location.
My addition to their plan would be to have baffles like at a gun range but in reverse. (see figure) This baffles are circular in shape but with a opening for the nuclear waste projectile. The openings are positioned to stop a projectile not within tolerances with regards to angle and speed. With the known target velocity (~ 20 km/s), angle, and acceleration due to gravity the path that the projectile would take would be calculated and any projectile not on this path would be stopped.
The key benefit to this idea is that if something were to happen during launch the nuclear waste would collide and at least be in a known location instead of somewhere in the sea. There would not have to be a search effort and the possibility of losing the projectile.
So because my knowledge is exhausted I turn to you guys to assess the feasibility of this solution from a physics perspective and the risks involved.
Also...
- Will air resistance make it impractical?
- Will air resistance melt the projectile?
- How can the baffles and projectile be design so that a collision would minimize the dispersion of nuclear material?
- How much certainty at launch is there that an aircraft/satellite/space debris is not in the way?
Connor
Last edited by a moderator: